My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH 3321 SOUTH FAIRVIEW ST
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
11/05/2007
>
75A - PH 3321 SOUTH FAIRVIEW ST
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:36:56 PM
Creation date
10/31/2007 11:31:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75A
Date
11/5/2007
Destruction Year
2012
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City of Santa Ana Chapter 1. Introduction and Overview <br />Impact Terminology <br />The following terminology is used to describe the level of significance of <br />impacts: <br />^ A finding of no impact is appropriate if the analysis concludes that the <br />project would not affect the particular topic area in any way. <br />^ An impact is considered less than significant if the analysis concludes that it <br />would cause no substantial adverse change to the environment and requires <br />no mitigation. <br />^ An impact is considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated if <br />the analysis concludes that it would cause no substantial adverse change to <br />the environment with the inclusion of environmental commitments or other <br />enforceable measures that have been agreed to by the applicant. <br />^ An impact is considered potentially significant if the analysis concludes that <br />it could have a substantial adverse effect on the environment. For the <br />proposed project, no impacts were determined to be potentially significant. <br />IS/MND Organization <br />The content and format of this report are designed to meet the requirements of <br />CEQA. The IS/MND consists of the proposed findings that the project, as <br />mitigated, would have no significant impacts. The bulk of this IS/MND consists <br />of the initial study and supporting studies. The report contains the following <br />sections. <br />^ Chapter 1, "Introduction and Overview," identifies the purpose and scope of <br />the IS/MND and the terminology used in the report. <br />^ Chapter 2, "Project Description," identities the location, background., and <br />planning objectives of the project and describes the proposed project in <br />detail. <br />^ Chapter 3, "Environmental Checklist and Analysis," presents the checklist <br />responses for each resource topic. This section includes a brief setting <br />section for each resource topic and identifies the impacts of implementing the <br />proposed project. <br />^ Chapter 4, "Mitigation Monitoring Plan and Report," presents a list of the <br />mitigation measures, identifies the time frame for implementation, identifies <br />the responsible monitoring agency, and includes a reporting form for <br />verification of compliance. <br />^ Chapter 5, "References," identifies all printed references and individuals <br />cited in this IS/MND. <br />^ Chapter 6, "List of Preparers," identifies the individuals who prepared this <br />report and their areas of technical specialty. <br />Alton Court August 2007 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration 1-3 <br />J&S 00635-07 <br />~ 75A-51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.