My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
80B - LOAN AGMT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2007
>
12/03/2007
>
80B - LOAN AGMT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 8:38:20 AM
Creation date
11/28/2007 2:24:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
80B
Date
12/3/2007
Destruction Year
2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL/ <br />AGENCY ACTION <br />MEETING DATE: <br />DECEMBER 3, 2007 <br />TITLE: <br />LOAN AGREEMENTS WITH TOWNSEND & RAITT, LLC <br />AND AUTHORIZATION OF RELOCATION PLANS <br />CI(In G1/ <br />CIWMA67GER��XECUTIIV DIRECTOR <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />I_1aa061TL: IW7 <br />❑ <br />As Recommended <br />❑ <br />As Amended <br />❑ <br />Ordinance on 1st Reading <br />❑ <br />Ordinance on 2nd Reading <br />❑ <br />Implementing Resolution <br />❑ <br />Set Public Hearing For <br />CONTINUED TO <br />FILE NUMBER <br />COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING COMMISSION ACTION <br />At its Regular Meeting of November 20, 2007, the Community Redevelopment <br />and Housing Commission voted against recommending the actions for City <br />Council and Community Redevelopment Agency consideration listed below by <br />a vote of 2:3 (Pedroza, Rodriguez, Vasquez: No; Turner: absent), <br />respectively. <br />The questions and concerns raised by the Community Redevelopment and <br />Housing Commission members included the following: Need for <br />Recommendation at Meeting; Alternative Funding Sources; Timing of <br />Acquisition; Identification of Location; Neighborhoods with Similar <br />Need; Availability of Social Services; Temporary Relocation; and <br />Remaining Tax Increment Funds. <br />Staff had recommended approval because the proposed activity would <br />continue to expand the City's historic efforts and commitment to <br />stabilize neighborhoods and provide quality affordable housing <br />opportunities. The amount of per unit subsidy is consistent with prior <br />approved projects. This was an opportunity to begin stabilization of <br />this neighborhood utilizing funding which is designated for the <br />expansion and preservation of affordable housing. <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />Deny. If the City Council wishes to approve this project, the following <br />actions are necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.