Laserfiche WebLink
KO 1 /24/07 <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2008-02 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF <br />THE CITY OF SANTA ANA DENYING TENTATIVE <br />PARCEL MAP NO. 2007-05 (COUNTY PARCEL MAP NO. <br />2006-308) TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL INTO <br />TWO PARCELS AT 2727 NORTH BRISTOL (APPEAL NO. <br />2007-05) <br />BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF <br />SANTA ANA AS FOLLOWS: <br />Section 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, <br />determines and declares as follows: <br />A. The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-05 <br />(County Map No 2006-308) to subdivide a single parcel into two parcels at <br />2727 North Bristol. The subject property is the Floral Park Promenade <br />shopping center and is located near the northeast corner of Bristol Street <br />and Memory Lane. The center is 6.17 acres in size, consists of two <br />existing parcels, and contains 26 tenant suites within four buildings and <br />71,848 square feet of commercial space. The subdivision would result in <br />a total of three separate parcels within the shopping center. <br />B. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-05 came before the Zoning Administrator <br />of the City of Santa Ana for a public hearing on November 14, 2007, and <br />was continued until November 28, 2007. On November 28, 2007 the <br />Zoning Administrator denied Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-05. The <br />applicant appealed the Zoning Administrator's decision. <br />C. On January 14, 2007, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public <br />hearing on Appeal No. 2007-05 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-05). The <br />matter was continued to January 28, 2008 at the Applicant's request. <br />D. On January 28, 2008, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public <br />hearing on Appeal No. 2007-05 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-05). <br />E. For Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-01, the Planning Commission <br />determines that the following findings have been established: <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, and its design and <br />improvements are consistent with the commercial land use <br />designation of the General Plan and are otherwise consistent with <br />Resolution No. 2008-02 <br />Page 1 of 6 <br />32A-21 <br />