My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32A - 2727 N BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
03/03/2008
>
32A - 2727 N BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/27/2008 1:53:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32A
Date
3/3/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-05 <br />January 28, 2008 <br />Page 3 <br />Section 66474 (b) of the Subdivision Map Act states that the legislative <br />body of a city shall deny a tentative map if it makes the finding that the <br />design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with <br />applicable general and specific plans. Together with other elements of <br />the General Plan, the Urban Design Element aims to curtail obsolete, <br />dysfunctional and chaotic development. The Urban Design Element goes on <br />to state "that development and subdivision patterns should be compatible <br />with existing patterns of development in and around districts and <br />neighborhoods, and provide a smooth transition along designated edges" <br />(Policy 2.12). The predominate subdivision pattern in the surrounding <br />area is rectangular shaped lots. The proposed subdivision creates an <br />irregular shaped parcel that will be difficult to develop over time <br />without acquiring additional land or applying for future variances. In <br />addition, the unorthodox shape of the parcel does not comply with the <br />intent of the City's subdivision and zoning ordinance (Exhibit 4). <br />For example, the City's Community Commercial (C-1) development standards <br />requires that each lot used for retail or service purposes have at least <br />120 feet of street frontage and an area of at least 15, 000 square feet. <br />The purpose of this requirement is to maintain a parcel width of roughly <br />the same proportion from front to back which results in a rectangular <br />parcel that can easily be developed over time. In the case of the <br />proposed subdivision, the new parcel will have 120 feet of street <br />frontage. The width of the parcel however, is maintained for only 15 <br />feet before narrowing considerably due to the constraints of designing a <br />property line around an existing building. The new lot line jogs <br />through common building walls, around building openings, utility panels <br />and exit doors creating an irregular shaped parcel that is not conducive <br />to future development. At the narrowest point, Parcel 2 is 15 feet wide <br />and maintains this width for nearly 160 feet, which is clearly not the <br />intent of the City's street frontage requirement or subdivision <br />ordinance. <br />The Subdivision Creates New Zoning Code Non-Conformancies <br />Section 34-67 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code (SANG) states that no map <br />shall be approved which would result in a violation of Chapter 8, which <br />regulates Buildings and Structures, or Chapter 41, which regulates <br />Zoning. Approval of the proposed map would result in several new non- <br />conformities being created in violation of Chapter 41 of the zoning <br />code. These new nonconformities are discussed below and include: front <br />yard setbacks, drive aisle width, loading zone and trash enclosure <br />locations, and a landscape buffer adjacent to residential property. <br />32A-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.