My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32A - 2727 N BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
03/03/2008
>
32A - 2727 N BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:33:14 PM
Creation date
2/27/2008 1:53:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
32A
Date
3/3/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-05 <br />January 28, 2008 <br />Page 5 <br />to the existing loading zone and trash enclosure. It is not a good <br />practice to allow these critical functions of a building to be located <br />on a different parcel than the building they serve. <br />Landscabe Buffer Adjacent to Residential Propert <br />A landscape area not less than five feet wide is required along any <br />property line to the extent it serves to separate property zoned or used <br />for residential purposes from any off-street parking area. Because the <br />site is a legal non-conforming parcel, this zoning requirement does not <br />currently exist; however, the width of the proposed subdivision <br />precludes this requirement from ever being met without the need of a <br />variance should the property redevelop in the future. <br />Subdividing Integrated Shopping Centers <br />Property is subdivided to create ownership opportunities for prospective <br />buyers and tenants. Each time an integrated center is subdivided, as a <br />general rule, additional ownership occurs and that parcel is no longer <br />subject to the same regulations applied to the integrated center. For <br />example, once subdivided, each parcel can develop independent of one <br />another and improvements made to one parcel are not necessarily carried <br />over to other parcels within the center. Each parcel is likely to have <br />different ownership which increases the probability that they will act <br />independently of one another, which is contrary to the concept of an <br />integrated center. For example, because of previous subdivisions <br />allowed by the City, this center no longer has street frontage on Memory <br />Lane as a separate parcel was previously created and approved by the <br />City. As property continues to be subdivided, it becomes difficult to <br />reassemble land for future development, especially for large-scale <br />development projects. <br />The proposed subdivision is not consistent with the City's General Plan <br />policies that are intended to curtail obsolete, dysfunctional and <br />chaotic development, nor the purpose or intent of the City's zoning code <br />or subdivision ordinance. This subdivision creates new conformancies <br />with City Codes. The odd shape of the parcel will make this property <br />difficult to develop over time without reassembling property or applying <br />for future variances. <br />Based upon the above analysis and findings, staff recommends that the <br />Planning Commission uphold the Zoning Administrator's decision and deny <br />Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-05 (County Map No. 2006-308). <br />32A-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.