My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25N - STUDY CSUF
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
04/07/2008
>
25N - STUDY CSUF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:32:47 PM
Creation date
4/2/2008 9:48:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25N
Date
4/7/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Language Capabilities <br /> <br />We provide multicultural research strategies as appropriate. We find the literal <br />translation of English instrumentation to be insufficient, and we emphasize the <br />development of linguistically and culturally appropriate research instruments and <br />methods. We regularly conduct research in the Latino and Vietnamese communities, and <br />have conducted surveys in Korean, Cambodian, Armenian, Tagalog, and Mandarin. Our <br />university setting allows us to access the linguistic and cultural expertise of members of <br />many racial/ethnic and national groups, The Cal State Fullerton campus affords access to <br />a broad range of faculty expertise and student perspectives, representing many etlmic <br />backgrounds and heritages. <br /> <br />Translated surVey instruments are programmed into Ci3 scripting software that interfaces <br />with the CA TI sYl>tem, This allows interviewers conducting English and non-English <br />language surveys to read the questions on the screen and type verbatim responses into the <br />CA TI system. Procedures for handling these open-ended text responses are discussed in <br />Appendix B, <br /> <br />Sample Design <br /> <br />A confidence interval for survey data refers to the level of precision required for <br />estimates of population parameters based upon sample data, A generally accepted <br />standard for policy-relevant research is a confidence interval of plus or minus five <br />percent. When this standard is met, we can be 95% confident that the true population <br />parameter lies within an interval extending five percent above and below any proportion <br />derived from survey (sample) data. A population paranleter is the result one would <br />obtain if all universal access customers were interviewed. <br /> <br />Sampling error, as indexed by the confidence interval around reported proportions, varies <br />in relation to sample size and to the variability of survey responses (among other factors). <br />In general, as the sample grows larger, the confidence interval grows na..rrower. That is, <br />inferences about population parameters based upon larger samples are more precise (are <br />associated with narrower confidence intervals) than inferences based upon smaller <br />samples, <br /> <br />Also, as the proportion of some attribute in the sample (e.g, overall satisfaction with the <br />Santa Ana WORK Center) approaches a fifty/ fifty split, (say, 50% are dissatisfied and <br />50% are satisfied) sampling error increases, resulting in a wider confidence interval. <br />Conversely, sampling error decreases as the proportion of a given attribute approaches a <br />five/ ninety-five split, (5% are dissatisfied and 95% are satisfied) resulting in a more <br />precise estimate and a narrower confidence interval. <br /> <br />Assuming a population of unique Universal Access customers of roughly 5,000 in the <br />program year under study, the table on the following page depicts the required sample <br />sizes for three confidence intervals: 1) Calculated leniently, that is, based upon the <br /> <br />6 <br />25N-32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.