My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25N - STUDY CSUF
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
04/07/2008
>
25N - STUDY CSUF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:32:47 PM
Creation date
4/2/2008 9:48:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
25N
Date
4/7/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />converting refusals by respondents whose eligibility has been established involves two <br />steps, After the first refusal, we call back at a different time. We ask for the eligible <br />respondent, beginning by apologizing for bothering them again, and subsequently <br />attempting to explain the scientific reason for our interest in speaking with them. This <br />procedure converts about 20% ofrefusals lmown to be eligible for the survey. If this <br />results in a second refusal, we will try one additional time using a "please help" approach. <br />This generally yields a conversion rate of 10%, After three refusals, the telephone <br />number is retired and classified accordingly. This procedure is a modification of <br />Dillman's (1978) Total Design Method. <br /> <br />Our response rates for listed sample survey projects such as this generally exceed 65% <br />and supports precise inferences from the sample to the population. <br /> <br />Quality Control and Verification of Data EntlT Procedures <br /> <br />Data entry and consistency-checking features of CA TI software, real-time random <br />monitoring of interviews in progress by SSRC shift supervisors, and daily review of the <br />data collected ensure high quality information that accurately depicts respondents' <br />answers to survey questions, <br /> <br />Survey questions and response options appear on a computer screen while the interviewer <br />is speaking to the respondent. Data are entered directly into the CATI system, which will <br />not accept out-of-range response options, so recording errors are reduced. In addition, <br />range and validity checks can be programmed to minimize other recording and survey <br />administration errors (e.g, verifying the number of jobs reported, whether income from <br />day labor was received, and the wages associated with each). <br /> <br />In addition to these technical features, SSRC supervisors are present during all <br />interviewing shifts. Each of our supervisors previously worked as an interviewer, and <br />each has been trained in telephone interviewing techniques and methodological <br />considerations. Random call-monitoring is perfonned during each shift to verify the <br />accuracy of the data. Clients can connect to this call-monitoring system from an off- <br />campus telephone number, allowing them to listen as data are collected. <br /> <br />Our 24-station CATI lab enables us to collect data quickly and our export function allows <br />for the rapid extraction ofresults into numerous fOID1ats, including ASCII, SPSS, and <br />SAS fonnats. The resulting quantitative data and open-ended text responses are reviewed <br />daily so that interviewing staff cawbe "debriefed" regarding vague or imprecise data, <br />This is done throughout the life of the proj ecl. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />25N-40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.