My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2008-04-07
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
04/07/2008
>
FULL PACKET_2008-04-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:32:35 PM
Creation date
4/2/2008 12:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR <br />COUNCIL ACTION <br />CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: <br />APRIL 7, 2008 <br />TITLE: <br />AGREEMENTS FOR AS-NEEDED <br />CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING <br />SERVICES <br />CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY: <br />APPROVED <br />^ As Recommended <br />^ As Amended <br />^ Ordinance on 151 Reading <br />^ Ordinance on 2"d Reading <br />^ Implementing Resolution <br />^ Set Public Hearing For_ <br />CONTINUED TO <br />FILE NUMBER <br />/ CITY MANAGER <br />RECOMMENDED ACTION <br />Authorize the City Manager and Clerk of the Council to execute the <br />attached agreements with Johnson-Frank & Associates, Inc. and Coast <br />Surveying, Inc. in the amount not to exceed $240,000 annually for each <br />firm, subject to non-substantive changes approved by the City Manager and <br />City Attorney. <br />DISCUSSION <br />This month the City commenced construction on the first part of the $100 <br />million project to rebuild neighborhood streets city-wide. Given this <br />sizeable build-up in the Capital Improvement Program, the Public Works <br />Agency Construction Engineering Section is experiencing an increased <br />workload in construction surveying which necessitates the services of <br />outside firms to handle the additional work. <br />To acquire these services, requests for proposal (RFP) were sent to seven <br />qualified firms and five firms responded. A committee consisting of five <br />staff members from the Public Works Agency evaluated the proposals. Each <br />firm was rated according to its qualifications, past experience and <br />capacity to perform the required work. For the purpose of comparing <br />cost, each firm submitted their fee for the preservation and <br />reestablishment of a single survey monument. Based on the proposals <br />submitted, the scores and the unit price fees for the top three firms are <br />as follows. <br />25M-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.