My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19E - APPROVAL AND ADOPTION ENTERPRISE ZONE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
06/02/2008
>
19E - APPROVAL AND ADOPTION ENTERPRISE ZONE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:30:41 PM
Creation date
5/28/2008 11:51:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
19E
Date
6/2/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
^ <br />Environmental Checklist <br />'~ For CEQA Compliance <br />Ana 1998:A-41). The proposed SEZ would operate as a business recruitment and retention <br />tool, intended to attract new businesses and help existing businesses to expand. Therefore, <br />the proposed SEZ would not result in any new residential development or housing projects <br />and would not place housing within the 100-year floodplain. Additionally, no new flooding <br />risks to existing development would occur as a result of the proposed SEZ. Thus, impacts <br />would be less than significant. <br />Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed SEZ would be located within the 100-year <br />floodplain, as well as the 500-year floodplain. These floodplains are associated with the <br />Prado Dam Inundation Zone. Prado Dam is a flood control and water conservation project <br />constructed and operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Los Angeles District. The <br />Los Angeles District has begun construction to increase the capacity of the reservoir behind <br />Prado Dam (USAGE 2006). The SEZ is a business recruitment and retention tool, which <br />would not result in the placement of any structures within the 100-year or 500-year floodplain. <br />Although structures could be developed as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives, <br />the improvements to Prado Dam would limit any potential flood impacts created by these <br />structures dr to these structures. Also, any structures built as an indirect result of the SEZ <br />designation would be required to comply with regulations imposed by the Flood Plain <br />Management Ordinance (City of Santa Ana 1982:19). Impacts would be less than significant. <br />G. Less-Than-Significant Impact. As stated under Section VIII-F, the proposed project is <br />within the 100-year floodplain; however, improvements to Prado Dam and the requirements <br />imposed by the Flood Plain Management Ordinance would limit flooding impacts created by <br />the structures or to the structures. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. <br />IX. Land Use and Planning <br />A. No Impact. The proposed project would not physically divide any established communities <br />or neighborhoods. The proposed SEZ would not involve the extension of highways or other <br />physical barriers through the community that could divide community areas. Therefore, no <br />impact would occur. <br />B. Less-Than-Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in any specific <br />demolition project, construction project, land acquisition project, or other development <br />project; therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable land use plan, <br />policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project. However, individual <br />projects that may occur as an indirect result of the SEZ business incentives would comply <br />with land use plans, policies, and programs set forth in the existing community and <br />redevelopment plan(s) relevant to the SEZ, and the City's general plan and specific plans <br />relevant to the SEZ. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. <br />C. No Impact. According to the City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element EIR, there <br />are no habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans established within <br />the city (City of Santa Ana 2004:11). Therefore, the proposed SEZ would not be in conflict <br />with any habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans. No impact would <br />occur. <br />X• Mineral Resources <br />Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone November 2007 <br />Initial Study 3-25 <br />J8S 00814.07 <br />19E-39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.