My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PUBLIC HEARING - METERED WATER RATE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
06/02/2008
>
75B - PUBLIC HEARING - METERED WATER RATE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:31:04 PM
Creation date
5/28/2008 11:51:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75B
Date
6/2/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY M-85 <br />220 S Daisy Avenue <br />PO Box 1988 <br />Santa Ana, CA 92702 <br />Date: April 26, 2008 <br />Subject: Increased Water Charges <br />I just completed reading the notice of "Proposed Increase Charges" for consumer water users. The <br />document abviously was composed by some eager coniver and word manupulator with no reasonable <br />feelings but his own. A very egoistic individual with a very greedy behavior. <br />COST OF LIVING INCREASES: If you can not afford giving cost of living increases, than do not give <br />them! Rest assure the denial will not initiate placing you against the wall and executed. Which sometimes it <br />could warrant such an act. <br />REASON FOR THE INCREASED CHARGE: What a joke!! Before initiating an action which incompases <br />a cost, the action should first be analyzed and bisected before any action is taken. Obviously, some <br />supervisor or supervisers did not use their knowledge in costs and were unable to control expenditures <br />thereby creating this so called "hearing" which , of course, the counsel will approve, thus the consumer will <br />have to pay for the incompetent supervisor(s)'s blunder. It is not illegal to terminate incompetent personnel <br />and be replaced by "new blood" personnel. This action seems warranted. <br />To conclude, it is obvious to expect moving parts to wear and tear themselves out to the extant they have to <br />be repaired or replaced. Every organization expects and is prepaired to spend time and money on a <br />nonfunctional part and The City is no exception. Maintenance is part of having moving parts last its <br />designed operating life and if the City is not capable of maintaining it's operations within the operating <br />costs of the organization than it doomed to failure--sooner or later it will calapse. <br />For what good it will be, I certainly am voting to bury this proposed increase and stop passing your "on <br />person defects" onto the consumer. <br />`ABTA LA VISTA' said Arnold. <br />75B-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.