My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL PACKET_2008-06-02
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
06/02/2008
>
FULL PACKET_2008-06-02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:30:37 PM
Creation date
5/29/2008 5:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
670
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Evaluation of Environmental Impacts: <br />I. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately <br />supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each <br />question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources <br />show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls <br />outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on <br />project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project would not expose sensitive <br />receptors to pollutants, based on aproject-specific screening analysis). <br />II. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, <br />cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as <br />operational impacts. <br />III. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is <br />significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the <br />determination is made, an EIR is required. <br />IV. "Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation <br />measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant <br />Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they <br />reduce the effect to a less than significant level. <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially with Less Than <br />Significant Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues & Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />1. Aesthetics -Would the project: <br />A. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ^ ^ ® ^ <br />B. Damage scenic resources, including but not limited ^ ^ ^ <br />to, trees, rock outpourings and historic buildings <br />within a state highway? <br />C. Substantially degrade the existing visual character <br />or quality of the site and its surroundings? ^ ^ ® ^ <br />D. Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime views <br />in the area? ^ ^ ® ^ <br />Santa Ana State Enterprise Zone <br />Initial Study 3-4 <br />November2007 <br />J8S 00814.07 <br />19E-18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.