My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
31B - SPR 2008-03 1425 AUTO MALL DR
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
07/07/2008
>
31B - SPR 2008-03 1425 AUTO MALL DR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:30:05 PM
Creation date
7/2/2008 11:27:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
31B
Date
7/7/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responses to <br />Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />E. Where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater is the soil capable of <br />supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems? <br />No Impact <br />The project site is an improved building site with an improved sewer system. In terms of geological <br />stability, the project will not require the expansion of additional sewer facilities. <br />VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br />A. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, <br />use or disposal of hazardous materials? <br />B. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substance <br />or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? <br />C. Be located on a site which is located on a list of hazardous material sites compiles <br />pursuant to Government Code Section 659662.5 and, as a result, would it create a <br />significant hazard to the public or the environment? <br />No Impact <br />Approval of the proposed auto dealership expansion would have no impact on transport or disposal of <br />hazardous material in that the proposed project would not involve activities that would emit hazardous or <br />acutely hazardous material. Additionally, according to the City of Santa Ana Fire Department and the <br />City's General Plan, the project site is not included on a list of hazardous material sites. Implementation of <br />the proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. <br />D. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not been <br />adopted, within two miles where a public airport or public use airport, would the project <br />result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? <br />No Impact <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR and the Orange County Airports Environs <br />Land Use Plan, the SD-60 project area is not located within any aircraft accident potential zones or crash <br />zones. However, according to the General Plan Land Use Element EIR, the proposed project is located <br />within a FAA Notification Area. The FAA has established height criteria to determine potential conflicts <br />with air navigation. The proposed project height is 34 feet at the highest point and will not exceed two <br />stories. And therefore would not be in conflict with height criteria established by the FAA. Additionally, <br />there are no private airstrips in the City. Therefore, approval of the proposed project would not increase <br />the potential for safety hazards for people residing in or working within the City. <br />VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality <br />A. Violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge <br />requirements? <br />E. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? <br />Resulting an increase in pollutant discharges to receiving waters? <br />I~e~~~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.