Laserfiche WebLink
U.S. DEP:~R'r~IEN'T OF HOC'SINL AND URBAN DE~'ELOPJIEN'1' <br />,•# ~IIIIIII * 1b';\SI II\C;TON. DC '0310-7000 <br />~~R <br />\tiSltil:\~I I tiP('Kla:\K1' PUIZ <br />(1)~I~Atl'~Ill~ PI_:AA'~ING :AEI) I~[\PLt1CAII~N f <br />i~`~~~~ ~ <br />The Honorable Miguel A. Pulido <br />Mayor of the City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />P.O. Box 1988 <br />Santa Aua, California 92702 <br />Dear Mayor Pulido: <br />Thank you for your letter of June 24, 2008, in filll support of Linda Summers' letter dated <br />June 5, 2008, requesting a modification to the Santa Ana Empowel•n~ent Zone's Developable Site <br />#3 to include an additional 682.8 acres, and to withdraw the City's original request to modify <br />Developable Site #1 as well. No modifications were requested for the Developable Sites identified <br />as Site # 1 and #2. Thtls, the resulting size of all three sites, upon approval of the modification to <br />Developable Site # 3, will be 1,742 acres. Reference the enclosed Exhibit A. Before addressing the <br />details of the Department's review of your expansion request, I am pleased to notify you that your <br />request to expand Developable Site #3 pursuant to 24 CFR § 598.425(b) has been approved. <br />Our review of this request focused on the definition of a developable site as provided for in the <br />Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 which states that a Round II Empowerment Zone may have up to three <br />noncontiguous parcels, not to exceed 2,000 acres, and that may be developed for commercial or <br />industrial purposes. The map found at Exhibit B of your modification request identifies the exact <br />locations of all three developable sites and clearly shows them as noncontiguous "parcels" within <br />the meaning of the statutory definition. The attached Exhibit C showing the "Santa Ana <br />Empowerment Zone Proposed Boundary Modification" for Site #3 supports the City of Santa Ana's <br />contention that this expansion has a zero population; accordingly, HUD deems the Zone to have met <br />the population requirements of 24 CFR § 598.100 (a). <br />In seeking to expand the Zone, the June 5th letter highlighted the benefits that would accrue as a <br />result of the expansion as well as successfill efforts to date in promoting the $1 1 billion tax incentive <br />package to your business community. In this regard, the letter also summarizes the strides that the <br />Santa Ana Empowerment Zone has made in using available federal tax incentives, such as the <br />issuance of 1,662 wage credit affidavits representing $4.8 million in federal tax savings to your <br />local businesses and the issuance of five Industrial Development Bonds totaling $27. I million. <br />In her June 5th letter, Ms. Summers also notes that given the most current economic data, there is <br />still a real need for increased job opportunities for Zone residents in Santa Ana. This is supported <br />by a comparison of Santa Ana's 6.9 percent unemployment rate based on February 2008 labor force <br />data for Local Workforce Investment Areas in California compared to the national rate of <br />Exhibit 1 <br />~c~~~~.hudgo~' espanol.hud.gov <br />251-3 <br />