Laserfiche WebLink
Section 2. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and <br /> CEQA Guidelines, the proposed Project is exempt from further environmental review <br /> under Section 15168 (Program EIR). This exemption applies when a previously certified <br /> Program Environmental Impact Report (Program EIR) has adequately analyzed the <br /> environmental effects of an activity, and no new significant impacts would result from the <br /> proposed project. If the proposed Project remains within the scope of the Program EIR <br /> and does not require a subsequent Environmental Impact Report (EIR), no additional <br /> environmental documentation is required. <br /> A CEQA Section 15168 Consistency Memorandum was prepared by First Carbon <br /> Solutions, the applicant's environmental consultant. The purpose of the memorandum <br /> was to determine whether the proposed project was exempt from further review, pursuant <br /> to the relevant 2007 MEMU Program EIR, certified in 2007, and the MEMU Subsequent <br /> EIR, certified in 2018. This memorandum was reviewed by City staff and City's <br /> environmental consultant, Ardurra Consulting. Upon review, it was determined that the <br /> Project does not introduce new or more severe environmental effects beyond those <br /> previously identified. Additionally, there are no substantial changes in environmental <br /> circumstances that would necessitate further review. Moreover, as required under CEQA <br /> Guidelines Section 15168(c)(3), all applicable mitigation measures from the MEMU EIR <br /> and SEIR will be incorporated into the project. Based on this analysis, the project qualifies <br /> for an exemption under CEQA, and no further environmental documentation is necessary. <br /> Therefore, Notice of Exemption, Environmental Review No. 2024-53, will be filed for the <br /> project. <br /> Section 3. The Applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend and hold the City <br /> and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, authorized <br /> volunteers, and instrumentalities thereof, harmless from any and all claims, demands, <br /> lawsuits, writs of mandamus, referendum, and other proceedings (whether legal, <br /> equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute <br /> resolution procedures (including, but not limited to arbitrations, mediations, and such <br /> other procedures), judgments, orders, and decisions (collectively "Actions"), brought <br /> against the City and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, <br /> agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set <br /> aside, void, or annul, any action of, or any permit or approval issued by the City and/or <br /> any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and <br /> instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City) for or <br /> concerning the project, whether such Actions are brought under the Ralph M. Brown Act, <br /> California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivision Map <br /> Act, Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, or any other federal, state or local <br /> constitution, statute, law, ordinance, charter, rule, regulation, or any decision of a court of <br /> competent jurisdiction. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve <br /> the legal counsel providing the City's defense, and that Applicant shall reimburse the City <br /> for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of <br /> the defense. City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any Action brought and City shall <br /> cooperate with Applicant in the defense of the Action. <br /> Resolution No. 2025-012 <br /> Page 2of4 <br />