Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana On -Call Civil Engineering, Architectural & landscaping Design Services <br />0 <br />f • i 0 <br />FOR SAMPLE <br />PROJECT <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Arterial Highway Rehabilitation <br />L Px ro1-eCt Descrip on <br />The City of Santa Ana has identified <br />a one -mile segment of arterial <br />highway as in need of rehabilitation. <br />The highway consists of four lanes <br />separated by a raised median island. <br />It is assumed for this purpose that <br />this highway will include localized <br />reconstruction areas along with <br />overlay of the existing asphalt. <br />A. Kickoff Meeting —A meeting will <br />be scheduled with the City of Santa <br />Ana, and any other stakeholders in <br />the project, including Caltrans. <br />B. Record Research — DMJM Harris <br />will obtain all record data available <br />from the City Central File Room. It is <br />expected that plans for all existing <br />improvements, striping, and signals <br />are available. <br />C. Field Assessments — The site <br />will be reviewed to identify asphalt <br />reconstruction limits, damaged curb, <br />gutter and sidewalk, and to locate <br />new sidewalk access ramps. DMJM <br />Harris will field walk a minimum of <br />three times to ensure all items are <br />accounted for. DMJM Harris requests <br />that City staff join us on the initial field <br />walk to obtain concurrence on our <br />findings. This initial review can also <br />act as the basis for the "Field Review <br />Form" for Caltrans requirements. <br />D. Field Survey — Aerial mapping <br />and field survey will be performed. <br />Field survey will include topographic <br />features and cross sections at 50-foot <br />intervals. <br />E. Utility Coordination — Initial letters <br />will be sent to all utility companies <br />requesting maps of all their facilities <br />within the project location. These <br />utilities will be plotted on the project <br />base map. At the 95% completion <br />stage, the pre -final plans along with <br />the typical sections will be sent to <br />the utility companies requesting a <br />review to ensure their utilities are <br />plotted correctly, identify any potential <br />conflicts and provide the construction <br />schedule. <br />F. Geotechnical Investigation — <br />Coring and sampling of subgrade <br />soils will be performed at strategic <br />locations. Laboratory testing will <br />determine the sand equivalent, R- <br />Value, sulfate and chloride content. <br />Engineering analysis of the collected <br />data and preparation of report with <br />pavement section design considering <br />alternative pavement sections. If <br />desired, deflection testing will also <br />be performed and included in the <br />analysis. <br />G. Plan Preparation — The project <br />plans will be prepared in Microstation <br />format, imperial units, and will include <br />the Project Title Sheet; Typical <br />Sections; Plan and Profile (20 scale) <br />that includes utilities, proposed <br />improvements, grades for curb <br />replacement for segments over 20- <br />feet, as necessary; Striping Plans (40 <br />Scale, Double -Stacked); and Traffic <br />Control Plans (40 Scale, Double - <br />Stacked). <br />Work flow for the design includes the <br />plotting of the street cross -sections <br />to determine the impact of the <br />proposed overlay at the joins. Along <br />the outside curb lanes, edge grinding <br />will be necessary to join the edge of <br />gutter. The cross slope will be verified <br />that it is within the given requirements <br />(<5%). At the raised median, edge <br />grinding is usually not an option as <br />it will potentially trap water along <br />the median curb. Due to this, the <br />median must be paved against, <br />thus reducing the effective curb <br />height. Criteria must be established <br />in determining if the remaining curb <br />height is acceptable. If it is not, the <br />options include the reconstruction <br />of the median improvements with <br />standard height curb, or reducing the <br />street's final surface through the use <br />of rubberized asphalt overlay, area <br />cold milling the width of the street, or <br />complete reconstruction of the street <br />section. Cost alternatives will be <br />prepared for these scenarios. <br />H. Specifications — Using the City <br />boilerplate, specifications will be <br />prepared in Word format and will be <br />based upon the Greenbook. Caltrans <br />references will be made as necessary <br />for traffic striping and signal detector <br />loops. <br />1. Cost Estimates — Detailed <br />estimates will be provided at the 75%, <br />95% and 100% completion dates. The <br />estimate will be formatted to identify <br />items eligible for reimbursement, if <br />state or federally funded. <br />J. Caltrans Coordination — As <br />required, DMJM Harris will assist <br />the City as needed in preparing <br />the required checklists, such as the <br />Field Review Form, PS&E, Utility, <br />and the Right -of -Way, to ensure <br />the Authorizations to Proceed are <br />secured from Caltrans. <br />K. Submittals — The submittals will <br />occur at the 35% completion stage <br />(conceptual), 65%, 95% and 1001/0 <br />completion. The 95% submittal will <br />be complete for final review. City <br />comments from the 95% submittal will <br />be incorporated and a final signature <br />submittal (original mylars) will be <br />made at 100%. <br />L. Scheduling — If required, <br />DMJM Harris will develop a project <br />schedule, with the City's input, that <br />will deliver the project in a timely <br />matter. This will include ample time for <br />Caltrans to process the Authorization <br />to Construct, if necessary, so the City <br />does not risk the loss of any monies <br />due to the expiration of the funding. <br />