My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
18A - HEARING OFCRS RPT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2008
>
10/06/2008
>
18A - HEARING OFCRS RPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:27:26 PM
Creation date
10/3/2008 12:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
18A
Date
10/6/2008
Destruction Year
2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />2 <br />3 <br />4 <br />S <br />6 <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />1S <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />2S <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />HON. JACK K. MANDEL (RET.) <br />JAMS <br />S00 N. State College Blvd. <br />Suite 600 <br />Orange, CA 92868 <br />Telephone: (714) 939-1300 <br />Fax: (714)939-8710 <br />SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA <br />COUNTY OF ORANGE <br />Daniel Miller, <br />Plaintiff <br />and <br />City of Santa Ana, <br />Defendant <br />JAMS Ref. No. 1200040532 <br />AMENDED APPEAL FROM A <br />DETERMINATION BY SANTA ANA <br />ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER OF A <br />VICIOUS ANIMAL <br />FACTS LEADING TO THIS HEARING: <br />On November 17, 2007 in the early morning Daniel Miller was walking his dog, a mature <br />Rottweiller, named BEAR, of approximately 1101bs. <br />Contact was made with a l Olb CI~flH[JAHUA, reamed Cookie, the property of Nora <br />Sergent, a widow. <br />Both Mr. Miller and Mrs. Sergent reside in 2"d floor condos in the same complex. <br />There had been an earlier altercation between the same two dogs in 2003. <br />In this instance the Rottweiller killed the CHIHUAHUA. <br />The facts as presented by the two pet owners dramatically differ and conflict. Under no <br />interpretation could the diverging facts be construed into the same scenario. <br />i <br />18A-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.