Laserfiche WebLink
Approval of the proposed general plan element amendments would <br />not directly result in any long-term air quality impacts in that <br />the approval of the proposed amendments would not generate <br />additional mobile source or stationary source long-term <br />emissions in the City that would exceed the threshold for <br />criteria pollutants established by the South Coast Management <br />District. Additionally, the proposed general plan element <br />amendments would not involve in any construction activities that <br />would emit short-term construction related emissions. Therefore, <br />approval of the proposed amendments would not result in <br />significant long-term or short-term air quality impacts. <br />C. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any <br />criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- <br />attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air <br />quality standard? <br />No Impact <br />Approval of the proposed general plan element amendments would <br />not be in conflict with the City's General Plan growth <br />projections and the local growth forecasts for the Orange County <br />sub region and the regional emissions budget developed by the <br />Southern California Association of Governments for the 1999 Air <br />Quality Management Plan. The Southern California Association of <br />Governments has determined that the air pollution impacts of any <br />project or activity that conforms to local growth forecasts <br />would be consistent with this forecast and the regional air <br />quality impacts would be adequately mitigated by the Air Quality <br />Management Plan to a level considered less than significant. <br />Therefore, approval of the proposed general plan element <br />amendments would not result in significant cumulative air <br />quality impacts. <br />E. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number <br />of people? <br />No Impact <br />Approval of the proposed general plan <br />not create any objectionable odors, in <br />proposed amendments would not directly <br />that would emit objectionable odors. <br />element amendments would <br />that the approval of the <br />result in any activities <br />6 <br />75C-44 <br />