My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH AIRPORT ENVIRONS ELEMENT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
02/02/2009
>
75C - PH AIRPORT ENVIRONS ELEMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:24:24 PM
Creation date
1/28/2009 12:28:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75C
Date
2/2/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. Directly or indirectly disturb or destroy a unique <br />paleontogical resource or site? <br />D. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside <br />of formal cemeteries. <br />No Impact <br />According to the National Register of Historical Resources, the <br />City of Santa Ana Local Register of Historical Resources and the <br />City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use Element EIR, Santa Ana <br />contains a high number of known cultural resources. <br />Additionally, according to the General Plan Land Use Element <br />EIR, Santa Ana also has a high probability for the discovery of <br />unknown cultural resources. A potentially significant impact to <br />cultural resources would occur when a project or activity <br />disturbs or displaces sensitive cultural resources. <br />Approval of the proposed general plan element amendments would <br />not result in impacts to any known or unknown cultural <br />resources, in that the approval of the proposed amendments would <br />not facilitate the development of any land uses or involve any <br />activities that disturb or displace known or unknown cultural <br />resources. Therefore, approval of the proposed general plan <br />element amendments would not result in significant impacts to <br />cultural resources. <br />VI. GEOLOGY/SOILS <br />A-1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the <br />most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map <br />issued by the State geologist for the area or based on <br />other substantial evidence of a known fault? <br />No Impact <br />According to the City's General Plan Land Use Element EIR there <br />are no active earthquake faults, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Zones <br />or landslides within the City. Therefore, approval of the <br />proposed general plan element amendments would not increase the <br />risks for ground rupture impacts or landslide impacts. <br />A-2. Strong Seismic Ground shaking? <br />8 <br />75C-46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.