My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
02/02/2009
>
75E - 2909 S BRISTOL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:24:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2009 1:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
75E
Date
2/2/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responses to <br />;~ Environmental Checklist <br />For CEQA Compliance <br />Analvsis: Please refer to the discussion of Issue XI.A, above. As indicated, construction <br />activities would be required to comply with the City's Noise Ordinance, including <br />restrictions on the time of day during which construction activities may occur. In <br />addition, the project site abuts Segerstrom Avenue, which is a major <br />thoroughfare. Noise levels associated with Segerstrom Avenue represent the <br />primary noise-generating source in the project area, and the proposed <br />construction activities would not represent a substantial increase over noise <br />levels existing without the proposed construction activities. Therefore, impacts <br />would be less than signiticant. <br />E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or where such a plan has not <br />been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the <br />project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise <br />levels? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analysis: Although the project site is located within the Airport influence Area for the John <br />Wayne Airport, the project would not result in the introduction of new residents <br />into the area. As such, the project would not result in any increase in airport <br />hazards for people residing or working in the project area, and no impacts would <br />occur. <br />F. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose <br />people residing or working in the project are to excessive noise levels. <br />Findin No Impact. <br />Analysis: There are no private airstrips within the project vicinity; therefore, a significant <br />impact would not occur. <br />XII. Population and Housing <br />Would the project: <br />A. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by <br />proposing new homes and business) or indirectly (for example, through extension <br />of roads or other infrastructure)? <br />Finding: No Impact. <br />Analysis: The proposed sewer lift station is intended to replace an existing sewer lift station <br />located approximately 700 feet to the west. The new lift station is proposed to <br />update the equipment and to provide additional redundancies in order to reduce the <br />chance for a sewer spill. The new lift station would not increase the capacity of the <br />existing sewer system in the vicinity. Because the proposed project would not <br />increase sewer capacity in the area, it would not induce substantial population <br />growth in the area. Impacts would not be significant. <br />Page 55 of 64 <br />75E-59 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.