Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />3. What are some private industry approaches to cost-of-living adjustments for <br />retired employees? <br />The large majority of private companies involved in pension plans separate from <br />Social Security have some type of system devised to deal with the general rise in <br />cost of living. Al though automatic adjustments based on the Consumer Price Index <br />(CPI) are not as prevalent in private industry, plans such as profit-sharing and <br />variable annuities equal and in most cases surpass the percentage rise in cost of <br />living. <br />Private management, prompted by increasing union pressure, has begun to realize that <br />the retired employee pension must have enough flexibility to cope with the ever <br />increasing inflationary trends. As stated in the July 1966 issue of "Business <br />Management", the AFL-CIO has already spelled out its goals in this area. Among <br />them: pensions that are based on an employee's earnings as well as his years of <br />service; that provide from 2~3 to 3~4 of low-paid employees' regular wages; that <br />contain cost-of-living adjustments; anc~ that provide for survivor benefits and early <br />vesting. <br />One of the most popular plans currently being used in private companies is the <br />variable annuities plan. Under this arrangement, retired employees receive part <br />of their retirement pay in the form of a fixed annuity - a certain amount of money <br />stipulated i.n advance, payable for life. They receive the other part in the form of <br />variable anr.:uities. A company invests the variable annuity portion of its pension <br />money entirely in corrLmon stocks. A retired employee then receives income that <br />fluctuates from year to year in accordance with fluctuations in the market value of <br />the stocks. The variable annuity usually makes up 25~ to 50~ of the total pension. <br />The courts have declared that this system is not in violation of that portion of <br />the Internal. Revenue Code that prohibits retirement plans from producing indeterminable <br />benefits. <br />A few of the companies involved in this plan are: Chemstrand, American Airlines, <br />Boeing Company, General Mills, Pan-American World Airways, Rohm and Haas Company, <br />Carnegie Corporation, Twrarner, Lambert Pharmaceutical Company and Kewanee Oil Company. <br />In Chemstrand and Kewanee Oil, 95~ of the employees voluntarily signed up for the <br />program at its inception, nearly 15 ,years ago, and the vast majority still remain today. <br />Only one known company which started the .program has abandoned it. <br />Following are the results of several variable annuity plans: <br />Chemstrand Flan. <br />An employee who retired on $200. ($133. fixed and $67. variable) in 1953 would today <br />be making in excess of $260. The cost of living has increased 16p in this period, <br />while the employee's total pension has increased 30~. <br />Kewanee Oil Compan~~ Plan. <br />An employee who retired on $200. ($100, fixed and $100. variable) in 1957 would today <br />make in excess of $276. The cost of living has increased 13p while the pension 380. <br />The companies that use a variable annuity plan hale found that it has several distinct <br />advantages. First it provides considerable protection against inflation and increases in <br />the standard of living. Second, it reduces the necessity for frequent or periodic <br />-2- <br />// <br />