Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.:. Provide comp:lrativc data for recovery levels to cthe~ MGT clients <br /> <br />The i'lformadoll sumrrl2rizcd in this repol addresses each of these issues and provides the Ciry wth the tools ne:::essary to make infonned <br />decisions about any proposed fee adjustments ane :he rc,;ultil1g impact on general =l.nc revellues, <br /> <br />The rexr section is;: d scl.lssio'1 ::1l:ou economic and r:dicy consider-lricns whic,", rray help hcilit;lrc the dist:lJ!>sion on wh::>r cmt recovery levels a"'e <br />appropriate fo~ San:a Ana. To assis: In that discussion. MGT of;ers the following comments ~el3,tive to wnat we have seen in other agencies: <br /> <br />0." Dc\Ociopment-rclated fees (plannng and budding) gene~al;y should bve high cost recovery leve!s (at or close to 100%). Exceptions may be <br />mace for scrvices such as appC';!.1 fe-eos. cr those pro\Oided exc\isively to residential applic2nts. <br /> <br />. No fee ~houkJ I>c ~~~ hi~ller tlldll 100% Lu~ll eLuvel y. ~ilhoul J~:..IU~UI e aooullhc r~um wh)< (c.g. a nne UI pcnaLy e'<;lIIelll) <br /> <br />o"~ If the proposed fee inc'-ease is: significant. some 2.ger'lcies will opt to phase in the inc,e:ase over;l pericc 0; :hree to five yea.rs. <br /> <br />.:. Comp"'ehensivc reviews should be Jndcrtaken every th'"ec to five years. with minor COSt o~ iving adjustments made on an annual basis. <br /> <br />;u <br />'" <br />lJl <br />o <br />C <br />- <br />o. <br />:J <br />"Z <br />OJ () <br /><C'" <br />"'0 <br /><DO <br />o'P <br />-0 <br />w~ <br />())()) <br /> <br />MGT <br /> <br />0- <br />" <br />(;, <br /><0 <br />2; <br /><0 <br /> <br />or A.IIl,[lIU. INC. <br />