My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 21 - Public Hearing - Amendments to the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Zoning District and Citywide Zoning Code
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
05/06/2025
>
Item 21 - Public Hearing - Amendments to the Transit Zoning Code (SD-84) Zoning District and Citywide Zoning Code
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2025 3:31:43 PM
Creation date
5/1/2025 10:57:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
21
Date
5/6/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
689
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 — Current and Proposed Text <br />Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the <br />project modifies the list of land uses and permit types including the deletion of industrial land <br />uses; amend nonconforming regulations including the additional of an amortization process; <br />amend and add operational standards for allowed uses and nonconforming uses; and delete <br />the Industrial Overlay (I-OZ) zone from text and maps; and delete the M1 (Light Industrial) and <br />M2 (Heavy Industrial) suffixes from certain properties within the TZC area. Thus, there are no <br />new land uses being introduced that would have air quality impacts. The proposed amendments <br />will introduce new regulations for nonconforming industrial use that would discontinue <br />nonconforming noxious uses, establish screening walls, eliminate vehicle servicing on Sundays. <br />These regulations would reduce dust and lessen air quality emissions. No land use shall <br />generate or cause any visible dust, gases, or smoke to be emitted into the atmosphere. Uses, <br />activities, and processes shall not operate in a manner that emits dust, fumes, odors, smoke, or <br />particulate matter, unless authorized under Federal, State, or local law. Sources of air <br />emissions shall comply with all rules established by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code <br />of Federal Regulations, Title 40), the California Air Resources Board, and the South Coast Air <br />Quality Management District. These regulations will have a beneficial impact to air quality. <br />Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would continue to be <br />subject to a project -level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual <br />project. In addition, compliance with the existing regulations and proposed amendments will <br />assure that potential impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to air <br />quality. Mitigation measures MM4.2-1 through MM4.2-36 would continue to apply. Therefore, <br />the project does not trigger new air quality impacts requiring the preparation of a subsequent or <br />supplemental EIR. There would be no new or more severe significant impacts to air quality. <br />5.3 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br />This section analyzes the effects to biological resources from implementing the proposed <br />zoning code regulations. <br />Would the project: <br />a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any <br />species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional <br />plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural <br />community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California <br />Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? <br />c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands (including, but not <br />limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological <br />interruption, or other means? <br />d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or <br />wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or <br />impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? <br />e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a <br />tree preservation policy or ordinance? <br />f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural <br />Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat <br />conservation plan? <br />TZC EIR Conclusions <br />January 2025 24 Environmental Analysis <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.