Laserfiche WebLink
The City determined that impacts related to endangered, rare, threatened, or special status <br />plant species or associated habitats or wildlife species, riparian habitat and sensitive natural <br />communities, wetlands or blue line streams, wildlife movement corridors, habitat conservation <br />plans, and biological resource policies would not have any impacts. Impacts to avian species <br />were less than significant with implementation of the mitigation measures. <br />The proposed adoption of the text regulations identified in Table 1 — Current and Proposed Text <br />Regulations would not require preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR because the <br />TZC area is intended to be developed for urban uses and located in an area that is completely <br />developed for urban uses. Because TZC area is a heavily disturbed and graded area consisting <br />of industrial and residential uses, and the project does not introduce any new types of land use, <br />and instead removes the industrial overlay zone, there will be no impacts to biological <br />resources. <br />Any future development within the TZC area requiring discretionary action would be subject to a <br />project -level CEQA review at the time an application is filed for an individual project. In addition, <br />compliance with the existing regulations and proposed regulations will assure that potential <br />impacts are not exacerbated, which will result in a beneficial impact to biological resources. The <br />project does not trigger new biological resource impacts requiring the preparation of a <br />subsequent or supplemental EIR. Mitigation measure MM4.3-1 would continue to apply. There <br />would be no new or more significant impacts to biological resources. <br />5.4 CULTURAL RESOURCES <br />This section analyzes the effects to cultural resources and tribal cultural resources from <br />implementing the proposed zoning code regulations. <br />Would the project: <br />a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as <br />defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? <br />b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource <br />pursuant to § 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? <br />c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique geologic <br />feature? <br />d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? <br />TZC EIR Conclusions <br />• Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code could <br />cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource or <br />disturb human remains. (Impact 4.4-1: Less Than Significant with mitigation) <br />• Long-term cumulative development occurring pursuant to the Transit Zoning Code has <br />the potential to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or unique <br />geologic feature. (Impact 4.4-2: Less Than Significant with mitigation) <br />The adoption of the Transit Zoning Code (SD <br />substantial adverse change in the significance of <br />Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. (Impac <br />and no feasible mitigation) <br />TZC EIR Mitigation Measures <br />84A and SD 84B) would result in <br />a historical resource as defined in <br />t 4.4-3: Significant and Unavoidable <br />January 2025 26 Environmental Analysis <br />