My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 21
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
05/06/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2025 10:20:23 AM
Creation date
5/1/2025 4:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
21
Date
5/6/2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Critical details need to be addressed - such as the inaccurate and subjective classification of"noxious" <br /> businesses. There are devastating consequences in the regulations for labeling a business as "noxious"—as the <br /> City has already done without justification to many businesses. These regulations would deny continued use of <br /> a clean business property for a small box of hoses or a pail of machine lubricant - while not requiring the same <br /> of a"noxious" gas station property with many thousands of gallons of hazardous fuel. That is simply not <br /> equitable or fair. <br /> We need a balanced approach that targets"bad actor"businesses. You know who they are -they degrade both <br /> business and residential neighborhoods. <br /> The City should focus on: <br /> Addressing the primary nuisance and "noxious" businesses -- 90% of the businesses do not cause any <br /> problems for the City or neighborhoods—yet they are being lumped in with the problem causing operators. <br /> Clarification of regulations --This re-zoning is every bit as significant to this area as the re-zoning is in the <br /> ongoing General Plan Update --but it has not received equivalent outreach, community input, and <br /> collaboration. <br /> At the Train Station meeting and at the Planning Commission -- residents recommended that the M-1 zone <br /> remain and that the M-2 zone designation be eliminated. <br /> Consider removing the M-2 overlay -- allowing the M-1 Light Industrial to remain - and converting current <br /> M-2 properties to M-1 ... as was done in the County of Los Angeles "Green" rezoning. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Mike Tardif <br /> z <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.