My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CRA 4 - LETTER OF OPPOSITION (10-05-2009)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
10/05/2009
>
CRA 4 - LETTER OF OPPOSITION (10-05-2009)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 4:15:57 PM
Creation date
10/5/2009 1:56:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10/05/2009 13:57 FAX 714 226 6460 IT FINANCE 0001 <br />ALegacy of Pres e <br />Santa Ana City Council <br />120 Civic Center Plaza <br />San#a Ana, California 92702 <br />;October a, 2008 <br />Santa Ana Historical <br />Preservation So~~~ <br />]Dr.1~ilIcliIa Howe-~T/affle Home & M a ° use ~~ <br />120 Civic Cex-ter Iarive `TGest, <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701-75~~ ~ i` (' ~ _ ~ . <br />(714} 547-9645 • ~.SantaAnaIr~r~tr1 ~ < < _, <br />', Rf~: Lacy Neighborhood Demolition for the Station District <br />Dear Council Members: <br />IThe Santa Ana Historical Preservation Societyr is appealing to the Council for a stay of execution on <br />the city-owned historic houses in the Lacy Neighborhood. Without your intervention that area will be <br />leveled at the end of this month, with no input by the community. <br />eleven city-owned properties have been offered to the Society for salvage of materials prior to <br />demolition. The Society feels That these properties are valuable historic resources and has attempted <br />since July to work with city staff to evaluate them for possible inclusion in the Station District Project. <br />IWe requested the opportunity to share our ideas with the Developer, but assume that this request has <br />been denied since city staff has ignored it. <br />t.ate last week {on October 1) we were informed by the Community Development Agency Thai salvage <br />ion these properties must be completed by October 29, or demolition will commence regardless. Given <br />that there is not yet even a plan for the project: we do not understand th8 rush toward demolition. <br />~We understand that a community outreach effort for the Station District will take place during the <br />month of October. These meetings will not be completed until October 21. The purpose of these <br />meetings has been stated as obtaining input from key neighborhood groups regarding the <br />'development of the 48 agency-owned parcels and the enhancement strategy for the larger district <br />~area_ The Society has not been invited to participate in these meetings. <br />!Regarding the Station District, we were #old by Cindy Nelson that "the Renaissance Plan does <br />,encourage historic preservation, as well as preservation of the neighborhood's character. We have <br />jevery intention of meeting these objectives with this strategy plan...." Further, when we expressed <br />(displeasure with the lack of community involvement in the planning process for this area, we were told <br />"...initial community/neighborhood meetings are being organized far the month of October." <br />Immediate demolition of the historic properties is completely incongruous with both the idea that the <br />Renaissance Plan encourages preservation, and the idea of community input regarding the <br />development. Commencing salvage on the properties, let alone demolition, prior to getting input from <br />the community groups completely removes the idea of preservation from the table, and does not give <br />;the public the chance to give their opinion on the metier. As for meeting the objectives of the <br />'Renaissance Plan, we fail to see that any historic preservation whatsoever is being considered in the <br />Station District. In fact, the Society was asked to give city staff the "top three° properties we would like <br />'to see preserved, and in a mailer of three weeks we were informed that this would not be feasible, <br />even though no firm plans for the project have been developed. <br />Finally, the Santa Ana Historical Preservation Society is disappointed and disheartened by the <br />appearance that "community outreach" is being carefully orchestrated, potentially even to the point of <br />i ~ ' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.