Laserfiche WebLink
subdivision to the east of the neighbofiood, has an entirely separate <br /> development pattern and architectural style than the subject neighborhood. <br /> D. The other properties mentioned as part of the appeal application are located <br /> within Tract No. 1298; however, each of the four parcels that were <br /> subdivided are located along the edge of the subdivision adjacent to Edinger <br /> Avenue and Newhope Street. While technically within the tract, these <br /> properties do not contain the same rural characteristics, such as the lack of <br /> sidewalk, rolled curbs and large front yard setbacks, of the properties <br /> adjacent to the subject parcel. Additionally, although subdivisions took place <br /> to create these properties, they were done in 1959, 1963 and 1981 <br /> respectively. The subject properties location within the interior of the "Little <br /> Texas" neighbofiood compared to the properties that were permitted to <br /> subdivide along the border of the tract, as well as the more than 28 years <br /> between the last approved subdivision do not support the claim set forth in <br /> the appeal that such parcels are similarly situated to the subject property. <br /> E. On October 12, 2009, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public <br /> hearing on Appeal No. 2009-01 (Tentative Parcel Map No. 2009-02). <br /> F. The subject property is located in the City's Little Texas Neighbofiood, <br /> which was annexed into the City. Prior to that, it was a small County <br /> island totally surrounded by the City. It is a small residential neighborhood <br /> notable for (i) large lot sizes (more than double the city average), and <br /> (ii) stables and the keeping of horses by private landowners. It is <br /> essentially the only area In the Clty where horses are still quartered in <br /> private homes. <br /> G. Although the proposed project complies with the various zoning <br /> requirements for the Single-Family Residential (R-1) zone and the density <br /> proposed is within the limits of the Low-density (LR-7) General Plan land use <br /> designation, there are critical environmental and public health impacts <br /> associated with this subdivision and the project does not comply with <br /> numerous policies of the City's General Plan Land Use and Urban Design <br /> Elements. <br /> <br /> H. The project's unique location within a neighborhood that has historically <br /> included housing for live stock, specifically stabling of horses, has resulted <br /> in the proposed subdivision resulting in an adverse impact on public health <br /> standards relating to the proximity of livestock to humans. Section 5-18 of <br /> the Santa Ana Municipal Code requires that no person shall keep livestock <br /> within 100 feet of any family residence with the exception of the home on <br /> the property. Negative health impacts including noxious odors and <br /> communicable diseases have been associated with the close proximity of <br /> humans to livestock. The approval of this subdivision request would <br /> further anon-conformity with this code requirement by reducing the lot <br /> Resolution No. 2009-16 <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br /> 75A-20 <br /> <br />