Laserfiche WebLink
substantial environmental damage or substantially and <br /> avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. <br /> 5. The design or improvements of the proposed project will not cause <br /> serious public health problems. <br /> The proposed project would have an adverse impact on <br /> public health standards relating to the proximity of livestock <br /> to humans. Section 5-18 of the Santa Ana Municipal Code <br /> requires that no person shall keep livestock within 100 feet <br /> of any family residence with the exception of the home on <br /> the property. Negative health impacts including noxious <br /> odors and communicable diseases have been associated <br /> with the close proximity of humans to livestock. The <br /> approval of this subdivision request would further a non- <br /> conformity with this code requirement by reducing the lot <br /> size and street frontage to the point of becoming practically <br /> impossible for the proposed lots to maintain the 100-foot <br /> separation from the neighboring properties. <br /> The ro sed ro'ect would als im li h <br /> o act ub c ealth and <br /> P Po P J P P <br /> safety by increasing the impervious surface of the subject <br /> property substantially above the amount that would be created <br /> without the proposed subdivision. This increase in impervious <br /> surface area will result in a greater amount of water run-off <br /> from the property. This increase in water run-off will negatively <br /> affect public health and safety by increasing the likelihood of <br /> flooding onto the street and adjoining properties as well as an <br /> increase the amount of pollutants entering storm drains and <br /> sewers. <br /> <br /> 6. The design of improvements of the proposed project will not conflict <br /> with easements necessary for public access through or use of the <br /> property within the proposed project. <br /> The design or improvements of the proposed project will not <br /> conflict with easements necessary for public access through or <br /> use of the property. Utility access easements have been <br /> identified on the submitted plan and are not in conflict with the <br /> proposed development. Access through or use of the property <br /> is not required by the public at large. <br /> Resolution No. 2009-16 <br /> Page 6 of 9 <br /> 75A-24 <br /> <br />