Laserfiche WebLink
bk 11 /09/09 <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 2009-XX <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br /> SANTA ANA DENYING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. <br /> 2009-01 TO SUBDIVIDE AN EXISTING PARCEL INTO TWO <br /> PARCELS IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT TWO NEW SINGLE <br /> FAMILY RESIDENCES AT 1013 SOUTH ELLIOTT PLACE <br /> (APPEAL NO. 2009-05) <br /> BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AS <br /> FOLLOWS: <br /> Section 1. The City Council of the City of Santa Ana hereby finds, determines <br /> <br /> and declares as follows: <br /> A. The applicant is requesting approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2009-01 <br /> to subdivide a single parcel into two parcels in order to construct two new <br /> single family residences at 1013 South Elliott Place. The subject property <br /> is the Little Texas neighborhood. The subject property is a 14,674 square <br /> foot parcel located on the north side of Elliott Place between Regent Drive <br /> and Gates Street. The interior lot is rectangular in shape and has <br /> approximately 108 feet of street frontage. Currently vacant, building <br /> records indicate that a 1,607 square foot residence and garage previously <br /> existed on the property. A permit was issued and finaled in 2005 to <br /> demolish the structures. <br /> B. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2009-01 came before the Zoning Administrator <br /> of the City of Santa Ana for a public hearing on September 9, 2009. <br /> Following a presentation by staff and testimony from the public, the Zoning <br /> Administrator adopted a resolution denying Tentative Parcel Map No. <br /> 2009-01 based on findings that the proposed subdivision was not <br /> consistent with the development pattern of the neighborhood and the <br /> project conflicted with several policies of the City's General Plan. <br /> C. The applicant appealed the adverse decision of the Zoning Administrator <br /> and subsequently appealed the adverse decision of the Planning <br /> Commission. The only objection ever made by applicant was his claim <br /> that the subject property is close to other lots which are comparable in <br /> size to the ones that are being proposed as part of the subdivision <br /> request. The locations of the lots that are referenced are directly to the <br /> north of the subject property and between 1,203 and 2,435 feet away from <br /> the property to the south and southwest. On October 12, 2009, the <br /> Planning Commission denied the applicant's appeal (No. 2009-02) and the <br /> tentative parcel map by a 5-0 vote (Yrarrazaval absent). <br /> Resolution No. 2009-XX <br /> Page 1 of 8 <br /> 75A-29 <br /> <br />