CORDOBA CORPORATION 2 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

both quantitative and qualitative, and will allow for an objective assessment of an alternative's ability to address the corridor mobility problem and the purpose and need for the project, as well as provide for comparison between alternatives. The goals, objectives, and evaluation criteria developed in coordination with the City and other project participants will be further refined, as necessary, to reflect input from the community as part of project scoping in Task 4 Using the Mobility Problem Definition as a guide, the Cordoba team will develop Goals and Objectives for the study process. The Goals and Objectives should be developed in a manner that permits the comparative evaluation of the alternatives against the Goals and Objectives. Specific goals should be developed for the Corridor and be consistent with the Go Local criteria including, but not limited to, the following: • Mobility improvement • Operating efficiencies • Cost effectiveness • Transit -supportive land use policies and conditions • Population density and ridership in the corridor • Local financial commitment • Financial feasibility • Equity • Environmental benefits • Public acceptance • Other factors The Cordoba team will develop objectives as more specific statements of desired approaches to attain each goal. The Cordoba team will also develop evaluation criteria, which would be quantitative or qualitative measures of the degree to which a given alternative would fulfill these goals and objectives. It is anticipated that an average of two to three objectives as well as two to three evaluation criteria will be developed for each goal. Additional goals may also be developed through input received from the scoping process. We will identify Goals and Objectives for the study corridor so that an approach and method can be developed for alternatives assessment along with community stakeholder review during Project Scoping. Based upon the Goals and Objectives, the Cordoba team will develop evaluation criteria and an Analysis Methodology Report to be used in evaluating the various alternatives for the study corridor. The evaluation criteria will enable a valid measurement of the alternatives and the determination of a locally preferred alternative. The evaluation criteria may be quantitative and qualitative, and contain measures that allow for assessment of an alternative's ability to address the identified transportation problem in the study area. The Analysis Methodology Report will include applicable input received during the scoping process. 8 1 gage