My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
YFMP PHASE I SEPTEMBER 2009 (2)
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2009
>
12/21/2009
>
YFMP PHASE I SEPTEMBER 2009 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2016 3:05:26 PM
Creation date
12/23/2009 4:11:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
WSA
Date
12/21/2009
Destruction Year
2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Program access <br />Program access- whether or not programs are open to all children and families or whether entry is <br />restricted to those meeting certain criteria or paying certain fees- was examined. Overall, 65% of <br />programs for youth and families had some type of restriction on participation. The most common <br />restrictions were by age and by income. Many programs have multiple restrictions or criteria that must be <br />met to gain entry into the program. <br />• 19% age restrictions <br />• 11 % income restrictions <br />• 9% required referral through another service <br />• 7% geographical restrictions <br />• 6% restrictions related to a health diagnosis <br />• 4% school specific <br />• 1% citizenship restrictions <br />The survey data showed some level of inter - agency collaboration insofar as organizations regularly refer <br />youth to other organization's programs. Fifty percent of organizations had some sort of referral <br />process. These processes varied from between referrals from social service agencies to referrals from <br />school outreach efforts. <br />Over half (65 %) of the programs offered to youth in Santa Ana reported being free (n = 104). The <br />percentages were similar for athletics and recreational programs as well as for those serving age groups <br />13 -28 years of age. An analysis of the data also demonstrated that the youth - serving organizations <br />received funding from various sources. Funding was categorized into public, private and fee - for - service <br />funding with most organizations (71 %) have one type of funding and only 27% rely on more than one <br />type of income. <br />74% of organizations reported receiving private funding <br />38% of organizations reported receiving public funding <br />13% reported fee - for - service funding <br />Most organizations were funded through private means such as donations, fundraising, and grants. <br />Sixty -three percent of organizations reported that they evaluate their programs. <br />Youth physical activity service provider survey <br />As mentioned above, the list of youth organizations providing physical activity was gleaned from the <br />larger, master list of organizations serving youth in Santa Ana compiled by the SAPID and Ersoylu <br />Consulting. For the analysis of organizations providing physical activity, several organizations self - <br />identified as having "recreation" in the initial phone- survey were not coded as "recreation" and counted in <br />the analysis below. This is because when agencies self- identified as having "recreation ", the list included <br />places /programs such as libraries and chess clubs, which we did not consider physical activity. Therefore, <br />the follow -up analysis focused exclusively on organizations that reported "athletic" or for which empirical <br />evidence showed that the organization provided physical activity programming . 21 <br />21 Some organizations self- identified as providing athletics, but upon follow -up analysis, it was clear that they did <br />not provide regular physical activity opportunities to Santa Ana youth and were therefore removed from analysis. <br />For example, the following organizations self- identified as "athletic" but were removed from the analysis because <br />of their limited scope: The American Lung Association, Orangewood, Mentoring Children of Prisoners and Youth <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.