My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RBF CONSULTING 1B - 2009
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
_PENDING FOLDER
>
READY TO DESTROY IN 2017
>
RBF CONSULTING 1B - 2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2024 3:33:14 PM
Creation date
5/11/2010 4:48:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
RBF CONSULTING
Contract #
A-2008-130-001
Agency
PLANNING & BUILDING
Council Approval Date
6/2/2008
Expiration Date
6/30/2010
Insurance Exp Date
11/30/2011
Destruction Year
2017
Notes
Amends A-2007-165, A-2008-130 Amended by A-2008-130-002, -003
Document Relationships
RBF CONSULTING 1 - 2007
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2017
RBF CONSULTING 1A - 2008
(Amends)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2017
RBF CONSULTING 1C - 2010
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2017
RBF CONSULTING 1D - 2011
(Amended By)
Path:
\Contracts / Agreements\_PENDING FOLDER\READY TO DESTROY IN 2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 ' <br />Iry <br />9 <br />City of Santa Ana <br />Proposal for the Bender Ready -Mix Concrete Manufacturing Project <br />tag b Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />tpoca�=r <br />project management time and other costs. Substantial delay is normally defined as 90 days <br />or more. <br />7. Costs are included for the number of meetings specified in the scope of work. If additional <br />meetings are needed, they can be included with an amendment of the budget. <br />8. The extent of public comment on an MND is not predictable. The proposed budget includes <br />a reasonable, preliminary estimate time to respond to comments. RBF will consult with the <br />City after the valuation of the comments to determine if the preliminarily estimated budget is <br />sufficient. An excessive amount of comments is generally considered to be more than <br />fifteen (15) commenting agencies/individuals and/or over 50 comments that require answers <br />other than "Comment is noted." <br />9. Costs have been allocated to tasks to determine the total budget. RBF may reallocate costs <br />among tasks, as needed, as long as the total budget is not exceeded. <br />10. Once the proposed project description, baseline, and alternatives are approved by the City <br />for analysis in the Initial Study, it is assumed they will not change thereafter. If changes <br />requiring revisions to analysis or rewriting of Initial Study information occur, an amendment <br />of the budget would be warranted. <br />11. The CEQA statutes or guidelines may change during the course of this Study. If <br />amendments require redoing work already performed or substantially increasing effort, a <br />contract amendment may be warranted. <br />JN 00-000300.10P • 29 • August 27, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.