Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives <br />Rationale. The project would not have any significant impacts on safety at railroad crossings. <br />Therefc r ,, midgation measures th t would rcquire grade separations can project area road-%-v as to <br />reduce potential auto/train conflicts are not required. Orange County Transportation Authority <br />(OC"-rA) is providing crossing safety cnhancements at Io railroad projects in the Cite of Santa Ana. <br />These planned upgrades xviU include ashin lights, pedestrian signals /gates, quad gates and raised <br />medians. Implementation of the 'Transit Zoning Code (SD f project Nvill enhance safety for <br />motorists and pedestrians. Current technolog y -"ill also be used to upgrade traffic and signal <br />controllers v th implementation of the proposed project. In addition to these project components, <br />the Transit Zoning Code will be amended to include police language in the St :rcct and Network <br />Concepts section that states: "'Any f tune or planned development adjacent or near the railroad <br />right -of-wa y be planned Nth the safety of the rail corridor in mind. TI-iis includes considering <br />pedestrian circulatio destinations ,%T.Titli respect to railroad right-- of-Xva . ", <br />a Proposed Mitigation Measure. Identify improvements and/or fu difig mechanisms to mitigate <br />the project's traffic impacts. (See Final HIR Chapter 3 (Responses to Comments), Letter from City <br />of "I'Usti (TUS), comment TUS- . <br />Finding. The Agency finds that specific eco of ic, legal, social, tech olog'cal, or other <br />Considerations inake this rnitigation measure infeasible. <br />Rationale. The DEIR identifies mitigation i easures needed as a result of expected project - <br />generate d traffic in Section 4.11.3. Specific a pro vei etits are identified in Mitigation I east es <br />UN11 .11- -1 through 1\R\44,11-16. Further, nAtigation measure MI\44.11-4 requires the Cite of Santa <br />Ana to "institute a program for s ystematic litigation of impacts as de velopment proceeds within <br />the Transit Zoning Code to ensure tigati of the individual improves ents." The program is <br />required to include, among other things, "a funding and improvement prograin ... to identify <br />financial resources adequate to construct all identified mitigation. measures in a timel y basis. "' <br />(Draft EIR Section 4.11.3, IN14611-4) The mitigation measures suggested by the City of Tustin <br />are already included in the project and will not provide meaningful additional mitigation beyond <br />the measures that are adopted. <br />Findings on Mitigation Measures Proposed to Reduce Impacts to Public Services <br />w Proposed Mitigation Measure. Require the application of parkland in-lieu fees in conjunction <br />p ith development of the project. (See Final EIR Chapter 3 (Responses to Comments), Letter from <br />Cite of Tustin (FUS), comment TUT --2. <br />Finding. The Agency finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, of other <br />considerations make this irdtigati n measure infeasible. <br />Rationale. Development under the 'Transit Zoning Code projcct 'and Developer Project is <br />required to comply with mitigation tyleasure MM . f - , wrl -ieh requires payment ent into the Park <br />Acquisition and D evelop me t Fund pursuant to Santa A tea Municipal Code Chap ter 35, Article IV. <br />Over and above the requirement for new development .t to pay into the Park Acquisition and <br />Development Fund, the Redevelopment t Agenc y is pursuing the acquisition and construction of a <br />range of potential open space amenities NNithin the 'Transit Zoni ng Code area, which could include <br />a public park, new community center and a tot lot. Finally, the standards for private open space <br />contained within the 'Transit Zoning Code are designed to ensure that new development provide <br />open space and outdoor ar e lties on-site as part of the project des* 19 n. Consequentl y, the impact <br />of the project on park facilities is less than sig'fieant and no further Mitigation is needed. <br />- Transit Zoning Cove ( EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />