Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 4 Statement of verridin Considerations <br />shading impacts -%vo ld result from the proposed Transit Zoning Code SD 84). <br />Cumulative development of additional medium -- and high -rise buildings ' %vould <br />lead to additional shade impacts to Nrarious shade -- sensitive uses throughout the <br />City. Therefore, cumulative shading impacts from future projects in the Transit <br />Village UA� and Do nto Nan M Zones constructed pursuant to the 'Transit <br />Zoning Code -%x1rould make a considerable contribution to this signs 'scant <br />cumulative impact. <br />Air Quality <br />Impact 4.2-5 <br />Construction activities associated -\%ith the construction of individual. projects <br />within the 'Transit Zoiling Code area, including the vel er project, Nvoul <br />contribute substantially to an existing or pro ectcd air quality violation for cr'iter'ia <br />air pollutants. <br />In -1pact 4.2-6 <br />Operation of the proposed project could exceed South Coast Jur Quality <br />l nagement District standards for VOC, N , CO, and I CI,, and -% could result <br />in a projected air quality violation. <br />Impact 4.2-7 <br />Construction and operation of the proposed project xvould result in a <br />cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutants for -%Nrhich the <br />proposed project region is in nonattainm nt tinder an applicable federal or state <br />ambient air qualit y standard. <br />cumulat vc <br />As the Basin is currend y in n nattaf me t for ozone, Co, NOx, P1\110, and P1\1115, <br />cumulati ve development would -%riolate an air quality standard or contribute to an <br />existing or projected air quaht y violation. Therefore, this is considered to be a <br />significant cumulative impact Nvithin the Basin. Construction under the proposed <br />project would make a cut uladvel y considerable contribution to this ignificant <br />impact. In addition, as discussed in Impact 4.2 -6, operation at full buildout of the <br />proposed project would result in quantities of air emissions that exceed the <br />SC Q SID thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, and PA1110, and would create a <br />cumulatively considerable contribution to this significant 'lpact. <br />Cultural <br />Impact 4.4-3 `I "he adoption of the Transit Zoning Code S would result in substantial <br />adverse change in the significance of a 111storical resource as defined in Section <br />15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. <br />Cumulative 'The cumulative analysis for impacts on cultural and paleontological resources <br />considers a broad regional system of xThich the resources are a part. The <br />Cumulative context for the cultural and paleontological resources analysis is <br />Orange County as a whole. WHe the project impact analysis for cultural <br />re ounces necessarily includes separate analyses f6t historic-period resources and <br />archaeological resources, the cumulative analysis combines these resources into a <br />single, iron -r ipe- %vable resource base and considers the additive effect of project- - <br />specific impacts to significant regional impacts on cultural resources. Because all <br />cultural re ourc s are unique and non - rent -,v ble members of rite classes, ail <br />adverse effects or negative ii-npacts erode a dxvindling resource base. Federal, <br />4-2 Transit Zoning Cove ( EIR Findings of Fact /Statement ent of Overriding Considerations <br />