80A - TRANSIT CODE AND STATION DISTRICT - EXHIBIT O

Home Browse Search

C~apt~r 3 ~~na~~r~s Reardfn~ Pro~~ct A~terr~attves ~~iabilit~~, LE-~.~, and ~,5, ~vhich s€~pport the goad of protecting and enha~~cit~ de~re~opn~ents sites and dist~~cts ~~~i~ch are uillque co~~munit~r assets t~~a.t e~~~~ance the qual~t~~ of life, or L~-5.~, 5,~, 5,5, 5,~, ~.9, 5,~0, and 5.~~, ~~Ti~ic~~ e€~sure that the i~x~pacts of de~reop~~c~~t are mitigated to the same extent as the proposed T~a~asit ~ot~ing Code, ~ee Land Use Eleme~~t; ~]r•aft SIR Table imilar~~r, it ~~rou~d not ft~~•ti~e~• tine goals of the Urba~r Design ~let~ent Coals ~~7~ to the sat~~e extent as the proposed Transit ~onit~g Code. Sec Urban Design ~ie~ne~~t; Draft EII~ Table ~,7~,~ l1~Ioreo~Ter•, t~~e integrated a~~d cohesi~Te cie~reiop~e~~t standards that are proposed. for the Transit honing Code area ~~tou~d not be irpieented, Last~~~, ~.ternati~~e ~ ~~~ould increase if~~pacts o~ transportation as a result of hack of emphasis on a~ternatt~re modes of transportation. i~ the current Genera ~'~a~~ and coning des~g~~ations and the hack of a de~TelopYr~er~t fra~~~e~~~ork to support transit-orie~~ted de~reiopment. I~or• tiYese reasons, tic ~enc~~ rejects ~lternati~re 1 as i~~~`easibie, ~terntiv~ ~ ~r~r~i Rduc~d deity T~~e C~7ef~ah deduced ~er~sit5~ ternatt~re ~~rould reduce the inte~~sit~T of ah anticipated land uses ~~~~thi~. the Transit ~o~~ing Code LSD at~ea bar 2~ percct~t, In general, this a.itei~]a~;Fe ~~rou~d ~•educe the nurnher of residet~cc, it~ciuding affordable ~lousit~g, and reduce ernpio~~ment opportunities as a result of less coxx~~~ercial uses in the area, peci~€cali}r, this alter~~~.~~Te ~vouid result in appro1~i~nate~~~ ~,0~9 fever residentiai units, az~d G,75o fe~~rer square feet of retail ~~~t~in t~~e Transit ~ou~t~ Code ~D S~} a~iea. ~~eciftc de~~eiopment c~~a~•acteristics that ~~fiouid be allo~ved unde~i t~~is alter~~ati~~e relad.~re to tine proposed Transit honing Code ~ 8~~ are spec~tied in Table 3~1 ~,~~~ternati~~e 2 and Proposed Transit Zo~~ii~g Code Characteristics. : . t~r~d Else ~'y~~ a~~emp~~ve 2 ~rar~s~ ~or~ing bode (SD 8~ D~`e~er~ce Com~e~c~a~ ~S~ ~1 ~~,~04~ ~124x~0~ ~ Civ« ~s~ ~2~,~OD} ~2~,~~ ~ Gre~~ ~s 6~~,0 ~D}~0~ ~ SOU~~: ~~S&J ~~~0 T'~~e ~~ge~~c~r Z~ereb}r f Ends ti~at specific econorara~c, iegal, sociai, teci~~xoloicai, or other co~~siderations make file adop~o~ of tips alternat~~~e ~t~feas~b~e. although ~~lternati~~e ~ ~~Tou~d so~~e~~rhat reduce the sigt~if~cant impacts of the proposed T`z~a~~sit ~o~ng Code ~D one aest~~etics, climate ci~ane, and transportariot~, it ~~roul~ not reduce at~3r of those Impacts -4 ~'ransit ~onlr~g bode 84} ~iR Findings of ~ac~lt~tee~t of Dverr~ding Car~s~derations i i