Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 4 Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />shading impacts would result From the proposed Transit Toning Code (SD 84). <br />Cumulative development of additional medium- and high-rise buildings «•ould <br />lead to additional shade impacts to various shade-sensitive uses throughout the <br />Cit}'- Therefore, cumulative shading impacts from future projects in the Transit <br />Village ('1'\~ and Downtown (D"I~ Zones constructed pursuant to the 'T'ransit <br />Zoning Code ~~'ould make a considerable contribution to this significant <br />cumulative impact. <br />Alr Quality <br />Impact 4.2-5 Construction activities associated «'ith the construction of indi~+idual projects <br />within the Transit Zorng Code area, including the Developer project, would <br />contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation for criteria <br />air pollutants. <br />Impact 4.2-G Operation of the proposed project would emceed South Coast tlir Qualit}+ <br />14Tanagcment District standards for VOC, NOa, CO, and PM[o and would result <br />in a projected air quality violation. <br />Impact 4.2-7 Construction and operation of the proposed project would result in a <br />cumulatively considerable neE increase of criteria pollutants for which the <br />proposed project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state <br />ambient air quality standard. <br />Cumulati~+c As the Basin is currently in nonattainment for ozone, CO, NO" P1~I,o, and P]\I25, <br />cumulative development would Violate an air quality standard or contribute to an <br />existing or projected air quality violation. Therefore, this is considered to be a <br />significant cumulative impact within the Basin. Construction under the proposed <br />project would make a cumulati~'el}' considerable contribution to this significant <br />impact In addition, as discussed in Impact 4.2-6, operation at full buildout of the <br />proposed project would result in quantities of air emissions that escced the <br />SCAQD•TD thresholds for 'VOC, NOT, CO, and Pl\•f[o, and would create a <br />cumulatively considerable contribution to this significant impact. <br />Cultural <br />Impact 4.4-3 "I'he adoption of the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84) would result in substantial <br />adverse change in the signiftcauce of a historical resource as defined in Section <br />15064.5 of the C1iQA Guidelines. <br />Cumulati~re "I'he cumulati~-e analysis For impacts on cultural and paleontological resources <br />considers a broad regional system of which the resources are a part. The <br />cumulative context for the cultural and paleontological resources analysis is <br />Orange County+ as a whole. \\/bile the project impact analysis for cultural <br />resources necessarily includes separate analyses For historic-period resources and <br />archaeological resources, the cumulative analysis combines these resources into a <br />single, non-renewable resource base and considers the additive effect of project- <br />specific impacts to significant regional impacts on cultural resources. Because all <br />Resolution No. 20'I CF-~~13ra1 resources are unique and non-renewable members of finite classes, all <br />Page 88 of 130 adverse effects or negati~*e unpacts erode a dwindling resource base. Federal, <br />c}_2 Transit Zoning Code (SD 84) EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />