My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-002 CRA
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (1974-2012)
>
2010-2012
>
2010
>
2010-002 CRA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:20:47 PM
Creation date
7/7/2010 12:33:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
CRA 2010-02
Date
6/7/2010
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 3 F/ndings Regarding Protect A/ternat/ves <br />viability, LE-4.3, 4.4, and 4.5, which support the goal of protecting and enhancing developments sites <br />and districts which are unique community assets that enhance the quality of life, or LE-5.1, 5.2, 5.5, 5.7, <br />5.9, 5.10, and 5.11, which ensure that the impacts of development are mitigated to the same extent as the <br />proposed Transit Zoning Code. (See Land Use Element; Draft EIR Table 4.7-3.) Similarly, it would not <br />further the goals of the Urban Design Element (Goals 1-7) to the same extent as the proposed Transit <br />Zoning Code. (See Urban Design Element; Draft EIR Table 4J-3.) Moreover, the integrated and <br />cohesive development standards that are proposed for the Transit Zoraing Code area would not be <br />implemented. <br />Lastly, Altemative 1 would increase impacts on transportation as a result of lack of emphasis on <br />alternative modes of transportation in the current General Plan and zoning designations and the lack of a <br />development framework to support transit-oriented development. For these reasons, the Agency rejects <br />Alternative 1 as infeasible. <br />~ Alternative 2: Overall Reduced Density <br />The Overall Reduced Density Alternative would reduce the intensity of all anticipated land uses within <br />the Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) area by 25 percent. In general, this alternative would <br />reduce the number of residences, including affordable housing, and reduce employment opportunities as <br />a result of less commercial uses in the area. Specifically, this alternative would result in approximately <br />1,019 fewer residential units, and 96,750 fewer square feet of retail within the Transit Zoning Code <br />(SD 84A and SD 84B) area. Specific development characteristics that would be allowed under this <br />alternative relative to the proposed Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) are specified in Table 3-1 <br />(Alternative 2 and Proposed Transit Zoning Code [SD 84A and SD 84B] Characteristics). <br />Land Llse Type AMemaHve 2 TiansiF Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 846) OdierenCe <br />Residential (units) 3,056 4,075 (1,019) <br />Retail (st) 290,250 387,000 (96,750) <br />Industrial (st) (990,000) (990,000) 0 <br />Commercial (st) (124,000) (124,000) 0 <br />Civic (sf) (21,000) (21,000) 0 <br />Green (sf) 680,000 680,000 0 <br />Parking (1, 772, 000) (1,772,000) 0 <br />SOURCE: PBS&J 2010 <br />Findings <br />The Agency hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations <br />make the adoption of this alternative infeasible. <br />3-4 Transit Zoning Code (SD 84) EIR Findings of Fact/Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.