|
§ 1.05 MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS
<br />Missouri. 'pillage of Beverly Hills v.
<br />Sehulter, 344 Mo 1098, 130 SW2d 632;
<br />Independence apt. #H ire (Mo App), 359
<br />SW2d 33; Ste*ger xT. Ste. eneN ieve, 235
<br />Mo App 679, 141 SW2d 233.
<br />Nebraska. Valentine v. Valentine
<br />Motel, Inc., 176 l eb 63, 125 NW2d 98,
<br />citing McQuillin text.
<br />Orth Dakota. Pickton v. Fargo, 1
<br />SID 469, 88 NW 90.
<br />Admissibility of pard videnee to shove
<br />taking of yeas and rya's, §14.07.
<br />" Arkansas. Hammon v. Dixon, 232
<br />Ark 537, 338 SW2d 9419 citing Mc uillin
<br />text.
<br />Indiana. Delphi v. Evans, 36 Ind 90.
<br />Iowa. Jones Y. Sheldon, 172 Iowa 406,
<br />154 NW 592# Marion Water Co. v. Mari-
<br />on, 121 Iowa 300, 96 NW 883; Preston v.
<br />Cedar Rapids, 95 Iowa 71, 63 NW 577.
<br />Kentucky. Citm' ns' Nat. Bank'
<br />Trustees v. Town of Loyall, 262 Ky 39, 8
<br />SW2d 952.
<br />Mirmeso a. Bruder v. Board of due -
<br />tiun, 177 Minn 19, 224 NW 268, citing
<br />McQuillin text.
<br />'as ingbDn, Buck v. Monroe, 8
<br />Wash 1, 147 P 432.
<br />Sufficiency of record as to recording
<br />yeas and nays. McLeod v. Purnell, 164
<br />Ark 696, 262 S' 682; Bloomfield v.
<br />Blakely, 192 Iowa 310,184 NW 634; Stag
<br />v. Jordan, 149 Iia 312, 89 So 1.
<br />5 Iowa. Sutton v. Mentzer, 1 4 Iowa 1,
<br />134 NW 108.
<br />United States. German Iris. Co. v.
<br />Manning, 95 F 597.
<br />CaHf rnia. Goodyear Rubber Co. v.
<br />Eureka, 135 Cal 613, 67 P 1643.
<br />I'llinois. Lewistown v. Braden, 9 1112
<br />620, 138 NE2d 504; Klein v. Reinhardt,
<br />163 Ill Hipp 257.
<br />Iowa. Bennett v. Petsburg, 138
<br />Iowa 67, 115 NW 582; Marion Water Co.
<br />. Marion, 121 Iowa 306, 90 NW 583;
<br />Preston v. Cedar Rapids, 95 Iowa 71, 63
<br />W 577; Bayard v. Baker, 76 Iowa 220,
<br />46 NNS' 818. Cf State v. Nebraska Tel.
<br />Co., 127 Iowa 194, 103 NW 120.
<br />Kentucky. . Orr v. Mann, 266 Ky 46,
<br />276 SW 491. See also Cornett v. Bailey
<br />Const. Co,, 203 KY 268, 202 SW 276.
<br />Penmylvania. Corry v. Corry Chair
<br />Co., 18 Pa Super 271.
<br />To same effect, Blair v. Carr, 24 Ohio
<br />Circ Rep 560.
<br />Cf: New t Alban* Cas Light Co. v. Crum.
<br />bo, 10 Ind App 369, 37 NE 10�2.
<br />Admissibility of parol evidence to
<br />prove taking of yeas and rays, §14.07.
<br />'Florida. Nelson v. State (Fla), 83
<br />Sold 696.
<br />Illinois. People v. Chicago N. W. Ry.
<br />Co., 396 Ill 592, 71 NE2d 701.
<br />Michigan. St ckert v. East Saginaw,
<br />2 Mich 104, 108.
<br />New York. In re Younglove, 80 Hurn
<br />240, 29 NYS 1039; In re South Market
<br />St., 76 Hun . v, 27 NYS 843.
<br />I111. EVIIJEN1 r NATURE
<br />
|