|
M
<br />t.
<br />V.
<br />.list.
<br />3
<br />r
<br />-n
<br />•0-,
<br />4
<br />n -
<br />W
<br />19 MUNICIPAL REC,0jRj)S § 14,09
<br />highway were freeholders).
<br />10wa. S��•ar� v. Indianola, 1Iowa
<br />� Perla, borne �'- Reese, 1 P� �
<br />, 1 8 (taking o yeas av� I, �2I I�� 54 7; rotr� v. ��'t�- City,
<br />Iowa. Farmer's Tel. o. V. ���asl�ta 115 Iowa 511, 8 ���' 107
<br />.
<br />157 Iowan 447, 133 N 361(taking of'yeas, Missouri. onsack Pearce v. School
<br />and nags). Dist. of Marceline, 226 Mo App 1233, 4
<br />Kentucky. MOnticeilo V. Regan, 253 SW2d 1 3 (rr+eeting)- Wattsv. Levee
<br />Ky 223, 79 SW2d 720. Dist., 164 Mo App 263, 283, 145 S�jl
<br />9
<br />Michigan. Stevenson v. Bay City, 2 (director's unrecorded sty 12
<br />Mich 44. ten t a to o -
<br />,sect o rr�eet�ig)-
<br />Itc� States, o�p v. '�llae of Perms i
<br />Do��'ne�s Grove, �4 �'2cl 974. �' via, Darlington v. Cr-
<br />onwealt, 41 Pa 68.
<br />14.0$. I i a f'e ions; creclitorst ri
<br />Since the rights creditors axedth�.
<br />� the erg ' rd persons cannot �•e'_
<br />such } * ti
<br />diced re absence of I record, as stated i n th e
<br />� iht will not det�• fast sct�r�,
<br />eyed the r�eiet of the corporate
<br />�'i��s ger record.' '�'
<br />sae to d rights red��.�• cart be
<br />e
<br />Porgy the regularity with which theire
<br />e�t� cor��� ars eta nor whetherUtes ' the
<br />rule, ark e�'idc ' are � a. ��. A a eera�
<br />s admissible t sPlr ars isj i
<br />merit. a mire etr`,'.3 Arid what ce��ei� ' ora���e.
<br />fact, �� raay be shown
<br />�
<br />evidence aliue the recrde � i�.."
<br />are et in an irr� � Thus, where the records
<br />imperfect manner, and there is no wr itten`
<br />in existencetprovethat. certainwork��� . e�r�der�ce
<br />oritY of the
<br />parol evidence ce wil be admissible t. r
<br />ark e�'�er� � admis��le t ogre that. fact.
<br />" And
<br />and that `-` show €.� aL�Lli was not present
<br />the city council had no right to tray
<br />notwith-
<br />standing the record recite suet �sir�e� r�tithi
<br />s that a ���rrr� was "found present.116
<br />r Morlda. mseYT v. Kissimmee, III
<br />`la 387, 149 So 553, citing McQuillin
<br />text-
<br />"IaD& Winfield v. Collins, 143 La
<br />3. 78 So * I . citing in text,
<br />Michigan.
<br />. laic aughar, v. Fest
<br />ioomfivid Tp.. 268 -All -C+ W, 2,%. =fix
<br />Ohio_ lair v ,ars . 2 Ohio Cir Ct
<br />Re i 4%U -
<br />e's_--tra ArnercnLa France
<br />Foramite Industries. Inc. �Tex Civ Apps.
<br />133 S%V2d 223. citing Mc uillin text;
<br />First Nat. Bank v .a-ndall, 1 White & W
<br />Qv Cas Ct App §971.
<br /># New erser'. Bigelow v. Perth Arn.
<br />boY, 25 NJL 297.
<br />Texas. Electra V. American La France
<br />& Foarnit Industries, Inc. (Tex Civ App),
<br />133 SW2d 223, citing McQuillin text,
<br />3 Arizona. Tolleson Union Hi
<br />School Dist. v. Kincaid, 5 Ariz 60, 8
<br />P d %6. citing I cQuillin text.
<br />Iifornia, Carruth v- Madera. '233
<br />Cil App2d 6M. 43 Cal F ptr &55_
<br />M
<br />5-
<br />iic .i , F -corse v. Peopl e.� Comm._
<br />trite Hospital Authority, 336 Mich 490,
<br />58 NW2d 159 (quorum pre } t )
<br />iouri. State v. Sappington �Mo
<br />App)} 261 S�j'2d 385 jboard`s action).
<br />New Mexico. Clovis v. North, 64 NM
<br />229, 327 Ptd 305. Citing l cQu illin text.
<br />P rrmlvar-ia, Gearhart v. Dixon, 1
<br />Pa St 224 (defective schaol records),
<br />'4 Uftitod States. Bridgeford Y. Tui -
<br />curnbia, 16 P 910, 913, 4 Woods CC 611.
<br />2
<br />
|