My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RESTRICTED USE OF CITY OWNED RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Legal Opinions
>
1972-2010 Opinions
>
RESTRICTED USE OF CITY OWNED RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 1:31:43 PM
Creation date
7/20/2010 1:52:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legal Opinions
Description
RESTRICTED USE OF CITY OWNED RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
Date
2/15/1973
Agency
Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Notes
OPINION 73-16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
nn it.s face, Section 706 does not appear t.o be discriminatory <br />to ~~rry r_]_ass (bccau~e of race, color or creed) nor clearly <br />r. ep:r~]runt to or inconsistent with "fundamental law. " <br />Stf~z'n_\r. Ber];eley 145 P. 167, Ex~arte Haskell 44 P. 725. <br />In its application is the Section unconstitutiona-1? <br />The famed Iio~~kir..s and Yi.ck woo cases invalidated ordinances that <br />were discriminatory in their application. however, in this in- <br />stance, the City shall maintain a uniform, clear and concise <br />policy regardnc the use of par]: and recreational facilities so <br />that there will b~ no room for bias to appear. (The basis will <br />be grounded on team or ind~_vidual residency and none other.) <br />QUESTION 3: Is the Policy a proper "Police Power." <br />~~NSW);R: Yes. <br />The cardinal. principal of the Judiciary has been to save not <br />destroy legislation. ttirhitney v. Ca]_. 47 S. Ct. 641: In so <br />doing, -the courts have b~`rrt over backwards to strain language <br />so as to avoid con~;titut.ional question In r_e Ullman 122 F. Supp. <br />G17, ~lnd have searched Cor arty conceivable and reasonable grounds <br />as to ~>>l.~y t:he 1_c;~~i_sl~ture acted as it did. L,A_. Couni_.y v. <br />h~rdh~:~~~ t. 1.11 P. 2d 963. <br />`t'he t:.r_~rs~:: is rat:]~ier sirr~hle~. Is the: legislation fairly ahpio- <br />pri~:tc~ t.o its dc;i.c]ned l:,urpose undor all the ciroumstances, <br />with: i1o rc'qu:irc:r~c~r~t that it be the host means. Secor~dJ_y, <br />whci.h.~r tyre orc~inancc~ sc~.r_\res the people or.. destroys -their in- <br />herent r_.i_ghts ~~nd lastly, whether the ordinance is reasonable, <br />in tl;.~zt i.t bear:, a rc:asonab]_e relationship to the ends. <br />Had~,c]~cck v. Sc1:~~~-i i_ar,, 293 U.S. 39~. Ther_ei:o~_e, the only <br />limi.k.~~t:ion is t.l~az- ~ fr~~ L~olice power not be arbitrary i.nfringe- <br />mcnl. of- the cor~~,t.i.t~ui.iorral riglZts of the individual. P~lil.]_er_v. <br />-- ---- -- <br />F3oaa-r; c;~ Pu1~a -i_c '~C?r]~S 239: I'. 251.; ~i'obacco Deal.er_s I3u7-cau v. <br />T- - r ~ ~'~Ir~~f~i`,~ ~'~.~ P. 2ct .j; Tr' rcP,aI'P,iOrC, 16 ~ ~~. 5~ and I3~rC1Ch V . <br />I3o<t r. cJ. > ~: Coni: r:,' 114 P. 2d ~;].5 . <br />]?u:1_`t:.~-':C.`f , t,lie cor;ce]~t of_ },~.'r]_iec; power l:as beer ext~endecl t.o <br />evc~ryll;incx c:r, dig ~t. t-.o i,]~,c h.r.cse.r_vat.ion o.f <safci.y, hc~~].tar, <br />co~r~~crt: or i.or--i_~~~ hromat.a_on of the general_ r~elfar.e. Mi_ll.c~:r., <br />sul, r:~, . <br />(~c~r~c•r,il ti~lelf~~.rc i t se1P ]i~~:, per_ tyre rtiller_ cas<,, extend~cl the' <br />~l~~i ~ r,:i ', i cin t o :i nc~l t~~:;-r~ p:rl~l i c ~,onvc.`ni ~~nc~c ~~r,ci <jc~nc:r~il pro:,hc~r:i i '~ <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.