My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/22/2010
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2010
>
02/22/2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 12:57:07 PM
Creation date
7/26/2010 2:02:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
2/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDAI"ION: <br />Receive and file the public comments on the draft Environmental Impact Report <br />No. 2006-02. <br />Commissioner Betancourt abstained from voting and left the Council Chambers. <br />Senior Planner Lucy Linnaus presented the staff report and recommendation. <br />Ms. Linnaus announced that the public comments period would be extended <br />from March 19, 2010 through April 12, 2010. Another session for public <br />comments will be held on March 22, 2010. <br />Planning Manager Haluza informed the public that their comments will be <br />recorded and transcribed as part of the Final EIR and that responses will be <br />provided, as applicable, in the Response to Comments sections of the Final EIR. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Public comments: <br />Paul Cook-Giles, resident of French Park Neighborhood, on Board of Directors <br />representing Mercy House at 801-808 E Santa Ana Blvd. and 707 Garfield, <br />commented on the potential negative impacts of retaining the existing structures <br />on the site of the proposed Francis Xavier House. He spoke in support of the <br />Francis Xavier project and he concurred that the existing structures have no <br />historical significance and that the analysis of the buildings in the Cultural <br />Resources section of the DEIR are relevant and appropriate as written. <br />Jackie Deter, property owner, requested confirmation that current standards <br />contained in M1/M2 zoning codes would still apply. She commented on <br />corrections to Chapter 4 Section 4.1-20 referring to nine zones in the <br />"Manufacturing" Overlay Zone instead of "Industrial" Overlay Zone. Correction to <br />Chapter 3 Project Description -Section 3-20 "... some industrial development <br />has been established in the eastern portion of the neighborhood." She <br />commented on the historical significance of the Lacy Neighborhood, the eastern <br />portion of that section has always been industrial as defined in the Spurgeon land <br />grant, which has not been changed; existing area was a rail yard. <br />Sam Romero, Logan Neighborhood representative and member of SACReD <br />Organization commented that the plan should provide adequate housing, provide <br />assistance to displaced low income residents, need open space (consider Lots 5 <br />and 6). Provided amarked-up Logan Neighborhood map to Commissioners, <br />concerned with impact of potential five-story buildings within the Logan area <br />prefers that development stay at no higher than two-story buildings. He promotes <br />improving the quality of life with this project. <br />Nick Spain, Director of The Grain Project, promoted community garden plan that <br />includes open space and edible landscape to encourage nutritional health for the <br />community. He also submitted a project proposal for community gardens to the <br />Commission that was originally written for the Santa Ana Renaissance Specific <br />Plan. <br />Alfredo Amezcua expressed disappointment with the process that has evolved, <br />commented that language of the DEIR is difficult to understand for residents <br />affected within the area, and recommended plan be available in Spanish and <br />Vietnamese. He is involved with SACReD and emphasized a need for affordable <br />housing, open space (for children to play) parklands. He mentioned that the <br />plan's review period requires more time before a thorough plan can be <br />implemented, encouraged that the plan be responsive to the needs of the <br />residents. <br />Planning Commission Minutes 4 February 22, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.