My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 19 Agreement with Robert D. Niehaus, Inc. for Long-Term Financial Planning and Water and Sewer Cost of Service Study
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
05/20/2025
>
Item 19 Agreement with Robert D. Niehaus, Inc. for Long-Term Financial Planning and Water and Sewer Cost of Service Study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2025 3:27:14 PM
Creation date
5/14/2025 3:27:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Public Works
Item #
19
Date
5/20/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF SANTA ANA <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B – References. The respondent grants permission <br />for the City to contact any individuals listed as references. <br /> <br />City may disqualify a Proposer if: <br />· References fail to substantiate Proposer’s description of services and <br />deliverables provided; or <br /> <br />· References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing <br />capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or <br /> <br />· City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the <br />Proposer’s responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City <br />working hours. <br /> <br />VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE <br />See Exhibit II – Sample Agreement <br /> <br />IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. Evaluation: The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will <br />evaluate proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined <br />directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br /> <br /> <br />B. Scoring Criteria: Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following <br />criteria: <br />CATEGORY POINTS <br />Responsiveness to RFP <br />· Proposal’s compliance with the requirements of this RFP. <br />· Scope of Services offered including ability to provide optional services. <br />· The value to any new and/or innovative product or service suggestions or <br />other new ideas and enhancements. <br /> <br />30 <br />Understanding of Need <br />Include milestones of completion of key tasks, to be completed by specific <br />team members. <br />25 <br />Relevant Project Experience/Schedule of Delivery <br />· Relevant project experience within the last 5 years, including experience <br />with public agencies. <br />The experience, resources, and qualifications of the firm and individuals <br />assigned to this account, including manager, supervisor and assigned staff. <br />35 <br />References <br />· References that are similar in size and project scope to the City. <br /> <br />10 <br />TOTAL POSSIBLE SCORE <br />(Before interviews – if held) 100
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.