Laserfiche WebLink
ZOA No. 2024-02 & AA No. 2024-03 (Transit Zoning Code Amendments) <br />June 3, 2025 <br />Page 18 <br />financial information is included in Exhibit 7 (March 6, 2025 Special Planning Commission <br />Supplemental Staff Report and Exhibits), which is attached to this staff report. <br />Legal Analysis <br />The Commission requested that the City Attorney provide a briefing related to legal <br />challenges to the proposed TZC amendments, specifically the creation of nonconforming <br />status to business and structures, and the general argument of a "taking," as that term is <br />used legally. The City Attorney's Office provided a confidential memorandum separately <br />to the Planning Commission summarizing these legal questions. Due to the potential for <br />litigation, the information contained in the memorandum is considered client privileged <br />and confidential. <br />Recommended Action Taken by the Plannina Commission — March 6. 2025 <br />At a special meeting on March 6, 2025, the Planning Commission voted 4:2:1, with <br />Commissioners Benninger and Leo dissenting and Vice -Chair Ramos absent (due to <br />advisement of a potential conflict of interest due to her residence being in close proximity <br />to the project area), to recommend that the City Council approve the recommended <br />actions. As part of its recommendation to approve, the Planning Commission included <br />clarifying edits to the draft ZOA proposed by staff, which have been incorporated into the <br />proposed text amendments. <br />General Plan Consistency <br />The proposed zoning ordinance amendments are consistent with various goals and policies <br />of the Santa Ana General Plan, including the Land Use, Community, Economic Prosperity, <br />and Conservation elements. Consistency with the General Plan is required by Government <br />Code Section 65860, by timely addressing current inconsistencies within an area of the City <br />prioritized for addressing EJ. In effect, the amendments are necessary to address numerous <br />policies of the General Plan that the current TZC is found to be inconsistent with, that without <br />such amendments, will continue the path of irreconcilable land use patterns within the TZC. <br />Specifically, these policies include Policy LU-1.1 (Compatible Uses), Policy LU-2.4 (Cost <br />and Benefit of Development), Policy LU-3.8 (Sensitive Receptors), Policy LU-3.9 (Noxious, <br />Hazardous, Dangerous, and Polluting Uses), Policy LU-3.11 (Air Pollution Buffers), Policy <br />LU-4.3 (Sustainable Land Use Strategies), Policy LU-4.6 (Healthy Living Conditions), Policy <br />CM-3.2 (Healthy Neighborhoods), Policy EP-1.9 (Avoid Conflict of Uses), Policy EP-3.3 <br />(Mitigate Impacts), Policy CN-1.5 (Sensitive Receptor Decisions), Policy CM-3.2 (Healthy <br />Neighborhoods), and Policy HE-5.5 (Community Development), which are targeted at <br />correcting past land use planning practices that have placed an unequitable environmental <br />and health burden on certain neighborhoods now termed disadvantaged communities. The <br />proposed amendments support these goals and policies by: <br />• Fostering the compatibility between residential and nonresidential land uses within <br />the TZC to enhance livability and promote healthier lifestyles, and improve public <br />health and quality of life; <br />