My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 19
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
06/03/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2025 5:18:26 PM
Creation date
6/3/2025 1:47:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,--Kennedy <br /> • M M I S S 1 • <br /> www_kcnnedy€nmmi-5.sinn_nrg <br /> June 3, 2025 17701 Cowan Ave-Some 200 <br /> Irvine,CA 92614 <br /> Mayor Valerie Amezcua 949 2�0 0909 <br /> Santa Ana City Council <br /> Santa Ana City Hall <br /> 20 Civic Center Plaza <br /> Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br /> RE: Agenda Item #19—Density Bonus Agreement No. 2025-02 (125 and 205 S. Harbor <br /> Boulevard) <br /> To The Honorable Mayor Amezcua and Members of the City Council, <br /> The Kennedy Commission (the Commission)is a broad-based coalition of residents and community <br /> organizations advocating for the production of homes affordable for families earning less than <br /> $30,000 annually in Orange County. Since 2001, we have successfully partnered with jurisdictions <br /> across the county to create housing and land-use policies that increase affordable housing <br /> opportunities for lower-income working families. <br /> The Commission recognizes and appreciates the City's ongoing efforts to expand affordable <br /> homeownership opportunities. We also urge the City to continue to prioritize and include deeper <br /> levels of rental affordable housing that is greatly needed in Santa Ana. Currently, the agreement <br /> proposes four units affordable to moderate-income households (80-120% AMI). However, Santa <br /> Ana's most urgent housing needs continue to be among households earning significantly <br /> less—those in the Low-, Very Low-, and Extremely Low-income categories. <br /> Santa Ana's housing and population trends highlight just how critical deeper affordability is for the <br /> community. A majority of residents are considered low-income, a result of persistently low wages, <br /> high housing costs, and a limited supply of affordable units. With a median household income of <br /> $85,914, many households fall below key income thresholds: those earning under $68,731 are <br /> considered low-income, under $42,957 very low-income, and under $25,774 extremely low-income. <br /> These income limitations, combined with high rents, have led to widespread housing insecurity. <br /> Over half of renters (54.4%) and nearly 40% of homeowners are cost burdened, spending more than <br /> 30% of their income on housing. Overcrowding is also a significant concern, particularly among <br /> renters, who make up nearly 67% of overcrowded households. These conditions illustrate a clear <br /> and urgent need for housing that serves those at the lowest income levels. <br /> The City's RHNA progress underscores the imbalance in housing production: in the current <br /> 2021-2029 cycle, Santa Ana has already exceeded its above moderate-income housing goal by <br /> more than double (3,487 out of 1,624 units), while producing only 296 out of 606 very low-income <br /> units and 258 out of 362 low-income units. In the previous cycle, the City delivered 452 very <br /> low-income units out of a 1,045-unit goal, and only 116 out of 1,232 low-income units, again falling <br /> short of its lower-income goals while vastly exceeding production for higher-income households. <br /> These trends reflect a housing system that continues to leave behind those with the greatest needs. <br /> We respectfully request that the City continue to explore all viable avenues for incorporating units <br /> of affordable Housing to low-, very low-, and Extremely Low-income households into <br /> developments in the City. Alternatively, a greater percentage of moderate-income units than the <br /> minimum five percent required could help improve access to homeownership for working families <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.