My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Correspondence - Item 32
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
07/01/2025
>
Correspondence - Item 32
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2025 3:27:35 PM
Creation date
7/1/2025 1:58:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Zuniga, Diana <br /> From: Diane Strickler < <br /> Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2025 3:25 PM <br /> To: eComment <br /> Subject: Strong Support for Item 32- June 1, 2025 Meeting <br /> Attention: This email originated from outside of City of Santa Ana.Use caution when opening attachments or links. <br /> Dear Santa Ana City Council, <br /> I am writing to express my strong support for Item 32. This ordinance would require all law enforcement officers in <br /> Santa Ana to display visible identification, including a name or badge number, and would ban the use of masks during <br /> interactions with the public. It also affirms the city's support for SIB 627 and SIB 805, two important state bills with similar <br /> goals. <br /> This proposal is about public safety, accountability, and rebuilding trust. Residents in Santa Ana have experienced <br /> serious harm from people impersonating law enforcement, including I C E agents and bounty hunters.These individuals <br /> often operate without uniforms or visible identification and in many cases they have unlawfully detained and physically <br /> assaulted people in our community.This is dangerous and unacceptable. <br /> Although California law currently requires officers to identify themselves when asked,that is not enough. Officers should <br /> wear visible identification at all times when interacting with the public. People should not have to guess who is a real <br /> officer or be forced to ask in tense or intimidating situations. <br /> Item 32 is not about targeting police. It is about protecting the public,the people,we,the Santaneros. It helps prevent <br /> impersonation, increases transparency, and ensures that anyone acting under the authority of law is clearly accountable <br /> to the people. Supporting SIB 627 and SIB 805 at the state level shows that Santa Ana is committed to leading on this <br /> issue. <br /> This ordinance must also include clear enforcement. Rules mean nothing without accountability. We need to make sure <br /> that these requirements are followed and that violations are addressed with real consequences. <br /> I urge you to vote YES on Item 32 and stand with the community. Although many of you have gone against the will of the <br /> people and forced more surveillance on us,this can be your opportunity to turn things around.The community is paying <br /> attention. We will remember the path every single council member chooses. And if you vote against us,we will not <br /> forget it. We will vote you out. <br /> As a reminder,there are true public servants who lead with integrity and courage. Leaders like Zohran Mamdani are <br /> proof that elected officials can stand with the people and stay true to their word.That is the kind of leadership we <br /> expect and demand. <br /> Your fellow constituent, <br /> Diane Cuevas <br /> Ward 2 <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.