My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HA Item 03 - Agreement for Bond Counsel Servies
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
07/15/2025
>
HA Item 03 - Agreement for Bond Counsel Servies
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2025 10:31:17 AM
Creation date
7/9/2025 9:26:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Community Development
Item #
03
Date
7/15/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(9) <br />EXHIBIT 1 <br />The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Incomplete proposals will be deemed <br />as nonresponsive and will be rejected. The City of Santa Ana reserves the right to reject any or <br />all proposals submitted and no representation is made hereby that any commitment will be <br />awarded pursuant to this RFP or otherwise. <br />PLEASE NOTE: <br />• All forms above must be signed by a representative of the Firm that is legally <br />authorized to contractually bind the Proposer. <br />• City will not waive notarization requirement when applicable on any of the <br />required attachments. <br />VII. REFERENCES <br />Contractor shall provide three (3) references from other similar public agencies for which services <br />similar to those specified in this RFP have been performed, including contact names and <br />telephone numbers. Use ATTACHMENT B — References. The respondent grants permission <br />for the City to contact any individuals listed as references. <br />City may disqualify a Proposer if - <br />References fail to substantiate Proposer's description of services and <br />deliverables provided; or <br />• References fail to support that Proposer has a continuing pattern of providing <br />capable, productive, and skilled personnel, or <br />• City is unable to reach the point of contact with reasonable effort. It is the <br />Proposer's responsibility to inform the point of contact(s) of normal City <br />working hours. <br />VIII. MINIMUM SCOPE AND LIMIT OF INSURANCE <br />See Exhibit 11 — Sample Agreement <br />IX. SELECTION PROCEDURES & CRITERIA <br />A. The City will establish a proposal review committee. The review committee will evaluate <br />proposals based on the response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions <br />and format, and the City evaluation criteria set forth below. <br />B. Proposers will be ranked by the review committee based on the following criteria: <br />CATEGORY <br />POINTS <br />Experience/Past Performance/References <br />Consideration will be given based upon the law firm's experience in acting as <br />bond counsel for municipalities to include work with housing authorities. <br />30 <br />Proposer shall include three (3) external client references from clients who <br />received similar services to those proposed for this solicitation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.