Item 06 -Minutes from the Regular Meetings of June 17, 2025 and July 1, 2025

Home Browse Search

CITY COUNCIL 22 JUNE 17, 2025 COUNCIL COMMENTS AB1234 DISCLOSURE – If the City paid for travel or other expenses this is the time for members of the Council to provide a brief oral report on attendance of any regional board or commission meeting or any conference, meeting or event attended. MINUTES: Councilmember Phan thanked everyone who spoke. She questioned staff about whether the City had made any requests for federal immigrat ion or border security agencies to be present in the city, whether the City had collaborated with the National Guard or specifically asked for their presence, raised concerns regarding reports of community members being detained by unidentified individuals who were presumed to be immigration agents, asked for clarification regarding a phone call the City Attorney received from the U.S. Attorney related to the City assisting in securing the federal building, and whether the City Attorney had previously received a direct call from the U.S. Attorney. City Manager Alvaro Nuñez confirmed the City had not made any requests for the agencies to be present in Santa Ana. Police Chief Robert Rodriguez confirmed the City had neither requested the National Guard's presence nor collaborated with their efforts. City Attorney Sonia Carvalho confirmed the City had received such calls before, but none were related to immigration; they were for other ongoing investigations. Councilmember Phan inquired regarding the essence of the U.S. Attorney's message, stating she understood that it was a threat about sending in the National Guard if the city did not help clear the federal building and requested clarification about the use of the term “overrun.” City Manager Nuñez responded that the U.S. Attorney requested help and assistance for federal agents and staff and that it was the U.S. Attorney that used the term “overrun." In response to Councilmember Phan, Police Chief Rodriguez confirmed that City police officers secured the federal building's sidewalks in an effort to prevent the National Guard from being deployed to Santa Ana; to which Councilmember Phan noted that the National Guard was deployed anyway and she asked the City Attorney if there was any law the city council could use to remove ICE from Santa Ana. City Attorney Carvalho stated the city has no authority to prevent ICE from operating within its boundaries. Councilmember Phan stated the city lacks any legal means to prohibit or remove ICE from Santa Ana, noting that if it were possible, Los Angeles would have already done so, and asked whether the city had any authority to remove Border Patrol. City Attorney Carvalho confirmed that the city does not have the authority to remove Border Patrol or the National Guard, noting that even the Governor, with significantly more power and the support of the California Attorney General, has been unsuccessful in forcing the National Guard out of the state.