Item 11 - Resolution to Provide Notice to the County of Orange Aiport Land Use Commision for the Village

Home Browse Search

procedure established in PUC sections 21676 and 21676.5. Before the decision to overrule the ALUC's Determination of Inconsistency may take place, the City Council must adopt a resolution that authorizes initiation of the two-step overrule process. D. At least 45 days prior to any decision to overrule ALUC, the governing body shall provide ALUC and the State Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Aeronautics a copy of the proposed decision to overrule along with supportive findings. ALUC may provide comments to the City Council within 30 days of receiving the proposed decision and findings. If ALUC's comments are not available within this time limit, the City Council may act without them. Should comments be received, the City Council must include the comments from ALUC in the public record of any final decision to overrule ALUC. This decision shall be determined at a public hearing to make the specific findings that the proposed overruling is consistent with the purposes stated in PUC Section 21670. E. Staff is hereby directed to conduct further studies as necessary in order to draft and provide notice of the findings in support of the overrule. The 45-day period will begin after staff has forwarded the intent to overrule along with the supportive findings. F. The Council's adoption of this Resolution is procedural and does not constitute the proposed Project's approval nor does it predispose the City's future action on the Project or any decision to overrule. G. Should the Council adopt this Resolution directing staff to conduct further studies as necessary in order to make the findings in support of the overrule, a public hearing will be required for Council consideration of the final supplemental environmental impact report, and any associated entitlement applications, for the Project. Section 2. The City Council finds that the requested action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and Section 15061(b)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Specifically, the resolution does not have the potential for resulting in either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment because it is limited to the City's proposal to overrule the ALUC's determination and does not commit the City to approve the Project. Concurrent with the review of the proposed Specific Plan, supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2025-01 (State Clearinghouse No. 2020029087) has been prepared for the proposed Specific Plan as a whole and will be presented to the City Council for consideration, along with the requested zoning ordinance amendment and amendment application, at a future hearing date. Resolution No. 2025-XXX Page 2 of 4