My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 10 - Receive and File - Orange County Grand Jury’s Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Long-Term Solutions to Short-Term Rentals
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2025
>
08/05/2025
>
Item 10 - Receive and File - Orange County Grand Jury’s Investigative Report, Findings, and Recommendations Regarding Long-Term Solutions to Short-Term Rentals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2025 4:05:28 PM
Creation date
7/30/2025 4:05:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
10
Date
8/5/2025
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Long-Term Solutions to Short-Term Rentals <br /> Table 3: Recent selected legal findings related to STRs <br /> Case Decision <br /> People v. Venice Suites, LLC, 71 Specificity in zoning language is necessary. <br /> Cal. App. 5th 715, 732-34 (2021) Length of occupancy was not specified in <br /> code and therefore STR usage would be <br /> permitted. <br /> Keen v. City of Manhattan Beach, 77 The term "residence" alone is not effective in <br /> Cal. App. 5th 142 (2022) banning STRs. A specific STR ordinance is <br /> necessary. <br /> Coastal Protection Alliance Inc. v. Operation of STRs in coastal zones does not <br /> Airbnb, Inc., 95 Cal. App. 5th 207, in and of itself constitute an increase in <br /> 270 (2023) density or intensity requiring changes in <br /> zoning. <br /> Kracke v. City of Santa Barbara, 63 Coastal cities need to secure and comply with <br /> Cal. App. 5th 1089 (2021) Coastal Commission rulings before drafting <br /> any limiting ordinances pertaining to STRs. <br /> These rulings highlight gaps in city ordinances and may provide grounds for appeal of STR <br /> citations. In light of these rulings, the cities of Anaheim and Santa Ana amended their codes to <br /> incorporate language that plugs the gaps, resulting in more effective STR enforcement. <br /> Managing Permit Scarcity <br /> Limits on the number of STR permits create a quasi-monopoly. In some cities, the permit limit <br /> was set at a point in time when no limit existed. The cities selected a number slightly greater than <br /> the inventory then in existence. Once the limit was set, these cities saw an acceleration in <br /> applications up to the limit. <br /> In some cities, STRs are excluded only in certain zones. Single family home (Rl) zones and <br /> Homeowner Associations (HOAs) often have exclusions. Other cities permit unlimited STRs in a <br /> "vacation home zone" near the beach or an attraction. Still others allow one STR in a fixed <br /> radius (typically 300 feet), which effectively limits permits. <br /> At least three cities (Newport Beach, Dana Point, and Orange)have created waiting lists in <br /> response to having more applications than available permits. However, STR operators rarely <br /> voluntarily relinquish their permits. If an STR has been converted to a long-term rental, then it is <br /> no longer subject to TOT. Unless the STR operator informs the city of the conversion, a city that <br /> only collects TOT annually (as at least one city does)will not know for a year that the unit is no <br /> longer operating as an STR. At that point, as they have not received any TOT from the unit, the <br /> 2024-2025 Orange County Grand Jury Page I I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.