Packet 4.14.25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Resolution No. 2025-XX Page 4 of 6 4 9 0 7 welfare, outweighs any argument that the facility should be allowed to continue operating based on the permit being issued in error. Moreover, the lack of substantial investments by the appellant, limited to a shipping container and commercial trash cans, further undermines a claim of a vested right to continue operations. As valid permits are essential for vested rights claims, and the minimal investments here do not demonstrate significant reliance on the invalid permit. These factors collectively reinforce the justification for revocation, aligning with California courts' consistent stance that protecting public welfare through proper zoning enforcement takes precedence over maintaining erroneously issued permits. Revocation of the LUC is more appropriate than suspension pursuant to SAMC Section 41-650.5 due to the property's ongoing non-compliance with city regulations, operations functioning outside of and in violation of the permitted use and conditions, and the significant risks posed to public well- being. The persistence of these violations, combined with the need to protect public health and safety, necessitates a more definitive action than temporary suspension. Revocation will ensure a complete cessation of non-compliant activities and effectively address the ongoing issues. Where temporary measures may fall short, revocation will decisively uphold community standards and regulations and address persistent violations. P. The Planning Commission of the City of Santa Ana determines that revocation aligns with the following goals and policies of the General Plan: •Goal LU-1: Growing Responsibly. Provide a land use plan that improves quality of life and respects our existing community o Policy LU-1.1 Compatible Uses. Foster compatibility between land uses to enhance livability and promote healthy lifestyles. •Goal LU-3: Compatibility of Uses. Preserve and improve the character and integrity of existing neighborhoods and districts. o Policy LU-3.3 Enforcement of Standards. Maintain a robust and proactive code enforcement program that partners with community stakeholders and is responsive to community needs. Revoking the LUC supports responsible growth and preserves neighborhood character by fostering compatible land uses. This action reinforces the City's expectation for responsible business operations and strengthens neighborhood livability. It also demonstrates Santa Ana's commitment to a responsive Code Enforcement Division that addresses community needs. •Goal CM-3: Active Living and Well-being. Promote the health and wellness of all Santa Ana residents. o Policy CM-3.2 Healthy Neighborhoods. Continue to support the creation of healthy neighborhoods by addressing public safety, land use conflicts, hazardous soil contamination, incompatible uses, and maintaining building code standards. The revocation is consistent with this General Plan Community Element goal and policy, as it addresses land use conflicts and public safety concerns that