My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 11.2.23
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Historic Resources Commission (2009-Present)
>
2023
>
Agenda Packet 11.2.23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2025 3:20:09 PM
Creation date
9/2/2025 3:18:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
135
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HEMA No. 2023-08 – The Cypress Fire Station (625 S. Cypress Avenue) <br />November 2, 2023 <br />Page 4 <br />3 <br />7 <br />9 <br />0 <br />interior layout. Originally, an interior wall was located between the two sets of windows, <br />however the proposed removal of the interior wall will create two pairs of windows at <br />different window heights. This change will create a uniform design with the remaining <br />south (side) façade windows. New bathrooms added to the north part of the building’s <br />interior will require two original door openings with upper transom windows at the north <br />(side) façade to be infilled with two new windows to match existing double-hung wood <br />windows. A third new window opening with new window to match existing style and <br />materials will be added to the north (side) façade as a new bathroom window. These new <br />bathroom windows will have obscured glass for privacy. One north (side) façade original <br />window that is currently located within a proposed bathroom adjacent to the rear office, <br />will be infilled with and relocated to the rear (east) elevation. The rear (east) façade <br />contains two non-original doors. The southern-most door will be infilled with stucco to <br />match existing and the northern-most door will be restored to match other secondary <br />doors, with an upper transom window. The proposed rehabilitation changes are located <br />at the building’s secondary side and rear facades which avoids the most significant and <br />character-defining features that are visible at the primary (west) façade. <br />Additional site improvements that do not require discretionary approval and therefore are <br />not part of this HEMA application include the following: Non-original concrete infill at the <br />primary (west) façade will be removed in order to restore the original driveway <br />configuration. The site will be landscaped with new, compatible planting materials. An <br />existing, metal front yard fence and gate will be removed and replaced with a compatible <br />3-foot-tall front yard fence. The materials and design are yet to be determined, but the <br />fence will be required to be reviewed and approved by Planning Division staff to ensure <br />compatibility. In order to enhance security, a new, eight-foot-tall CMU block wall will be <br />added to the property’s rear (east) property line and parts of the north and south rear <br />property lines. The rear yard will be redesigned with a new basketball court to the south <br />and two new parking spaces to the north—one of which will be ADA compliant. A new <br />curb ramp will be adjacent to rear parking, leading to a raised ADA sidewalk with access <br />to and around the subject building. The property’s rear will be accessible by a new, eight- <br />foot-tall sliding metal security gate adjacent to an existing alley. The design is also yet to <br />be determined, but the gate will be required to be reviewed and approved by Planning <br />Division staff to ensure compatibility. <br />Analysis of the Issues <br />As proposed, the project will follow the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards (SOIS) for <br />the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, <br />Restoring, & Reconstructing Historic Buildings (Kay D. Weeks and Anne E. Grimmer, <br />revised 2017). The proposed exterior modifications would be considered a combination <br />rehabilitation and restoration project, and as such be evaluated against ten criteria for <br />both treatments. Staff has reviewed the proposed modifications in comparison to the <br />SOIS. The rehabilitation standards listed below analyze the proposed tenant <br />improvements and ADA access project elements that are focused on the side (north and <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.